• 亿邦公众号
    • APP下载

一年关店200多家 “甜品鼻祖”被卖了

作者:章航英 文章来源:天下网商

2026-05-05 09:59

作者:章航英 文章来源:天下网商

2026-05-05 09:59

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

文章核心介绍鲜芋仙品牌从兴盛到被收购的历程,揭示行业教训和实用启示。

1. 重点事件:鲜芋仙曾是中式甜品鼻祖,2007年创立,巅峰期门店超800家,但近年关店严重,2023年关260家店,从高峰缩水超200家,现仅约600家店;2026年被CFB集团收购,CFB是DQ和棒约翰的中国运营商。

2. 衰落原因:产品老化(核心芋圆、仙草、豆花多年未变)、定价过高(经典系列25元起步,加料后超40元,比竞品贵)、分量缩水和创新不足,导致竞争力下降,消费者评价不一。

3. 新机会:CFB接手后推出焕新计划,包括4月底更新门店风格、引入DQ经验的地域主题店,如成都店融入熊猫元素,可能帮助鲜芋仙翻红。

4. 行业趋势:餐饮连锁从单一品牌扩张转向品牌矩阵模式,如CFB收购鲜芋仙补全中式甜品品类,借以优化估值;个人可关注糖水赛道机遇,例如新品牌如麦记牛奶快速开店。

文章聚焦品牌营销、定价策略和产品研发问题,提供市场观察与教训。

1. 品牌营销失误:鲜芋仙缺乏主动消费者沟通和社交媒体互动,新品推出慢(仅靠季节限定如草莓系列),导致品牌沉寂;竞品如赵记传承推广小食套餐,增强吸引力。

2. 定价与竞争:鲜芋仙高价策略(单价超40元)在稀缺性消失后失败,对比竞品赵记传承和麦记牛奶的十几元起步价,更高性价比胜出;奶茶咖啡的9.9元低价冲击甜品场景。

3. 产品研发启示:鲜芋仙产品逻辑老旧,创新不足,未推出新爆款;但基础产品扎实(如芋圆年销千万份),留存核心用户;CFB通过快速上新(DQ年推150款新品)和私域运营,保持活力。

4. 消费趋势:新中式糖水从2024年翻红,消费者偏好情感价值(大享乐理论),如鲜芋仙的古早味吸引80、90后;品牌需关注季节性补全,如鲜芋仙冷热甜品弥补DQ波动。

5. 用户行为:社交评价显示“好吃”但“分量少、贵”,用户趋向性价比高、创新快的品牌;品牌应结合在地文化(例:CFB拟开主题店)强化认同。

文章解读市场变化、机会与风险,提供事件应对和可学习点。

1. 增长市场与机会:新中式糖水赛道2024年后回暖,机会巨大,如麦记牛奶10个月开1000家店,赵记传承650家店;CFB收购鲜芋仙显示品类整合机会,卖家可借势进入。

2. 需求变化:消费转向高频、性价比高的享乐品类(大享乐理论),糖水搭配小食(如赵记传承的糖水+车仔面套餐)受欢迎;卖家需产品创新应对需求。

3. 风险提示:鲜芋仙部分区域代理商运营不善、欠租,显示管理风险;行业饱和导致单品牌天花板显现(如鲜芋仙门店萎缩),卖家应避免类似错误。

4. 事件应对措施:CFB通过标准化改造、供应链整合和数字化营运解决鲜芋仙问题;卖家可学习其模式,快速响应热点(例:DQ推迪拜风味冰淇淋)。

5. 合作与商业模式:资本收购(如方源资本入主CFB)成为退出策略,卖家可探索品牌矩阵合作;最新模式如CFB的渠道下沉能力,帮助拓店至低线城市。

文章揭示产品设计需求和商业机会,突出数字化与电商启示。

1. 生产需求:鲜芋仙产品需现做现卖(手作概念),但分量少影响消费者体验,工厂应优化规格;竞品如赵记传承推小食套餐,显示多功能产品设计需求。

2. 商业机会:新中式糖水兴起(2025年回潮),工厂可提供芋圆、仙草等核心原料;CFB收购后计划门店焕新,带来供应链合作机会(如成都主题店元素)。

3. 推进数字化启示:CFB的数字化营运管理被强调,如私域运营提升效率;工厂可学习其标准化流程(例:鲜芋仙被CFB整合),降本增效;电商方面,社交媒体评价影响销售,需加强在线沟通。

文章分析行业趋势、痛点和解决方案,聚焦新技术应用。

1. 行业趋势:餐饮连锁转向品牌矩阵逻辑(如百胜中国多品牌覆盖),而非单一扩张;新中式糖水赛道回暖,服务商可关注该增长点。

2. 客户痛点:季节性波动(例:DQ冰淇淋冬季遇冷)、产品创新不足(鲜芋仙核心SKU老化)、运营风险(区域代理商欠租);服务商需针对性解决。

3. 解决方案:CFB展示供应链整合经验(如统一管理DQ、鲜芋仙)、数字化营运(私域能力推动65%新品销售)、标准化改造(补全品类降波动);服务商可推类似系统,助力客户快速上新。

文章阐述商业对平台需求和平台操作,强调运营管理与风险规避。

1. 平台需求:商业需要多样品牌矩阵(如CFB整合DQ、鲜芋仙覆盖享乐品类),平台招商应吸引多品类互补伙伴;鲜芋仙被收购显示对标准化和下沉渠道的需求。

2. 平台最新做法:CFB拓店至低线城市,利用数字化管理(如DQ同店增长7%-8%);计划推出鲜芋仙主题店(例:成都店融合川剧元素),平台可借鉴此类本地化运营。

3. 运营管理:CFB的私域运营和产品上新(年150款)被验证有效;平台需强化招商策略,管理风险如避免鲜芋仙式代理问题;风险规避提示行业饱和挑战,应聚焦品牌质量非数量。

文章探讨产业动向、新问题和商业模式,提供政策启示。

1. 产业新动向:餐饮连锁从规模扩张(例:蜜雪冰城万店)转向品牌矩阵模式(如CFB收购鲜芋仙);资本主导,2021年方源资本1.6亿美元入主CFB,四年增值212%,显示估值优化趋势。

2. 新问题:单品牌天花板限制增长(鲜芋仙门店停滞),政策方面可启示支持多品牌整合;企业退出策略如私募出售(方源资本拟售CFB估值5亿美元)成主流。

3. 商业模式:大享乐理论(提供情感价值的品类扩展)被CFB应用,鲜芋仙补中式甜品短板;案例比较贡茶全球2400家店高位套现,启示品牌做深溢价策略优于快速扩张。

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

The article chronicles the rise and acquisition of Meet Fresh, a leading Chinese dessert brand, offering key industry lessons and practical insights.

1. Key events: Meet Fresh, founded in 2007, was a pioneer in Chinese desserts. It peaked with over 800 stores but saw a sharp decline, closing 260 stores in 2023 alone, shrinking by over 200 stores from its peak to around 600 currently. In 2026, it was acquired by CFB Group, the Chinese operator of DQ and Papa John's.

2. Reasons for decline: The brand suffered from product stagnation (its core offerings like taro balls, grass jelly, and tofu pudding remained unchanged for years), high pricing (starting at 25 RMB for classics, exceeding 40 RMB with add-ons, making it pricier than competitors), reduced portion sizes, and a lack of innovation, leading to diminished competitiveness and mixed consumer reviews.

3. New opportunities: Post-acquisition, CFB launched a revitalization plan, including a store style refresh by late April and introducing regionally themed stores inspired by DQ's experience (e.g., a Chengdu store incorporating panda elements), which could potentially help Meet Fresh regain popularity.

4. Industry trend: The food and beverage chain sector is shifting from single-brand expansion to a brand portfolio model. For instance, CFB's acquisition of Meet Fresh complements its portfolio with Chinese desserts, aiming to optimize valuation. Individuals can explore opportunities in the dessert beverage sector, exemplified by new brands like Maiji Milk rapidly expanding.

The article analyzes brand marketing, pricing strategies, and product development, providing market observations and lessons.

1. Brand marketing missteps: Meet Fresh lacked proactive consumer communication and social media engagement, with slow new product launches (relying mainly on seasonal limited editions like strawberry series), leading to brand dormancy. Competitors like Zhaoji Chuancheng gained traction by promoting snack combos.

2. Pricing and competition: Meet Fresh's premium pricing strategy (over 40 RMB per item) failed as market scarcity diminished. Competitors like Zhaoji Chuancheng and Maiji Milk, with starting prices around ten RMB, won on value-for-money. The rise of 9.9 RMB milk tea and coffee also challenged the dessert occasion.

3. Product development insights: Meet Fresh's product logic was outdated with insufficient innovation, failing to launch new hit products. However, its solid foundational products (e.g., taro balls selling tens of millions annually) retained core users. CFB maintains vitality through rapid new launches (DQ introduces 150 new items yearly) and private domain operations.

4. Consumer trends: New Chinese-style dessert beverages gained popularity again from 2024, with consumers favoring emotional value (the 'Great Indulgence' theory). Meet Fresh's nostalgic appeal attracted the 80s/90s demographic. Brands should focus on seasonal portfolio completion; for example, Meet Fresh's hot/cold desserts can complement DQ's seasonal fluctuations.

5. User behavior: Social reviews indicate products are 'tasty' but 'small portions and expensive.' Users gravitate towards brands offering better value and faster innovation. Brands should integrate local culture (e.g., CFB's planned themed stores) to strengthen identity.

The article interprets market shifts, opportunities, and risks, offering actionable strategies and learnings.

1. Growth markets & opportunities: The New Chinese Dessert Beverage sector rebounded post-2024, presenting significant potential. Examples include Maiji Milk opening 1000 stores in 10 months and Zhaoji Chuancheng reaching 650 stores. CFB's acquisition of Meet Fresh signals consolidation opportunities; sellers can leverage this trend for market entry.

2. Evolving demand: Consumption is shifting towards high-frequency, value-for-money indulgent categories (Great Indulgence theory). Dessert beverages paired with snacks (e.g., Zhaoji Chuancheng's dessert + cart noodle combos) are popular. Sellers need product innovation to meet demand.

3. Risk warnings: Poor management by some Meet Fresh regional agents, including rent arrears, highlights operational risks. Market saturation reveals single-brand growth ceilings (e.g., Meet Fresh's store contraction); sellers should avoid similar pitfalls.

4. Response strategies: CFB addressed Meet Fresh's issues through standardization, supply chain integration, and digital operations. Sellers can learn from this model to respond quickly to trends (e.g., DQ launching Dubai-flavor ice cream).

5. Collaboration & business models: Capital acquisitions (e.g., FountainVest's investment in CFB) offer exit strategies. Sellers can explore brand portfolio collaborations. New models like CFB's channel下沉 capabilities facilitate expansion into lower-tier cities.

The article highlights product design needs and commercial opportunities, emphasizing digital and e-commerce implications.

1. Production demands: Meet Fresh products require made-to-order preparation (handmade concept), but small portions impact consumer experience; factories should optimize specifications. Competitors like Zhaoji Chuancheng offering snack combos indicate demand for versatile product designs.

2. Commercial opportunities: The rise of New Chinese Dessert Beverages (resurging by 2025) creates demand for core ingredients like taro balls and grass jelly. CFB's post-acquisition store refresh plans present supply chain collaboration opportunities (e.g., elements for Chengdu themed stores).

3. Digital advancement insights: CFB's emphasis on digital operations management, such as private domain strategies boosting efficiency, is notable. Factories can learn from its standardized processes (e.g., integrating Meet Fresh) to reduce costs and improve efficiency. E-commerce-wise, social media reviews significantly impact sales, necessitating enhanced online communication.

The article analyzes industry trends, pain points, and solutions, focusing on new technology applications.

1. Industry trend: The F&B chain sector is shifting towards a brand portfolio logic (e.g., Yum China's multi-brand coverage) rather than single-brand expansion. The resurgence of the New Chinese Dessert Beverage segment is a key growth area for service providers to monitor.

2. Client pain points: These include seasonal fluctuations (e.g., DQ ice cream sales dipping in winter), insufficient product innovation (Meet Fresh's core SKU aging), and operational risks (regional agent rent arrears). Service providers need targeted solutions.

3. Solutions: CFB demonstrates expertise in supply chain integration (e.g., unified management of DQ and Meet Fresh), digital operations (private domain driving 65% of new product sales), and standardization (portfolio diversification to reduce volatility). Service providers can offer similar systems to help clients launch products rapidly.

The article outlines business demands on platforms and platform operations, emphasizing operational management and risk mitigation.

1. Platform demands: Businesses require diverse brand portfolios (e.g., CFB integrating DQ and Meet Fresh to cover indulgent categories). Platform招商 should attract complementary品类 partners. Meet Fresh's acquisition highlights needs for standardization and下沉 channel capabilities.

2. Platform best practices: CFB expands into lower-tier cities using digital management (e.g., DQ achieving 7%-8% same-store sales growth). Plans for Meet Fresh themed stores (e.g., Chengdu store integrating Sichuan opera elements) exemplify localization strategies platforms can adopt.

3. Operational management: CFB's effective private domain operations and rapid product launches (150 items annually) are validated. Platforms must strengthen招商 strategies and manage risks, avoiding代理 issues like those faced by Meet Fresh. Risk mitigation requires focusing on brand quality over quantity amid saturation challenges.

The article explores industry movements, emerging issues, and business models, offering policy implications.

1. Industry dynamics: F&B chains are transitioning from scale expansion (e.g., Mixue Bingcheng's 10,000+ stores) to a brand portfolio model (e.g., CFB acquiring Meet Fresh). This shift is capital-driven; FountainVest's $160 million investment in CFB in 2021 yielded a 212% value increase in four years, indicating a valuation optimization trend.

2. Emerging issues: Single-brand growth ceilings (e.g., Meet Fresh's stalled store count) suggest policy could support multi-brand integration. Exit strategies like私募 sales (FountainVest's potential $500 million valuation sale of CFB) are becoming mainstream.

3. Business models: The 'Great Indulgence' theory (expanding categories offering emotional value) is applied by CFB, using Meet Fresh to address its Chinese dessert gap. Case studies like Gong Cha's high-value exit with 2400 global stores suggest deep, premium branding strategies outperform rapid expansion.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

“糖水鼻祖”为何卖在了风口刚起的节点上?

“有这么一个中式甜品品牌,开一家火一家,卖的就是现做现卖的古早感觉,大大的一份超级过瘾。它有无数‘招牌’,而最具特色的当数芋圆、仙草和豆花。”

社交媒体上的一条高赞评价,记录着鲜芋仙作为“糖水鼻祖”的特点和曾经的辉煌。

但在2026年4月,其母公司休闲国联集团决定将其股权出售。买家是CFB集团,Dairy Queen(DQ冰雪皇后)和棒约翰在中国市场的操盘手,背后站着私募股权基金方源资本。

这一时机值得关注。事实上,“新中式糖水”赛道从2024年开始翻红,去年麦记牛奶公司10个月开出1000家门店,赵记传承则已经在全国90多个城市开出超过650家门店,连海底捞都在上海开出了糖水铺特色店,越来越多奶茶品牌也开始卖“木薯糖水”“桃胶炖奶”等单品。

但最早把这个品类做大的“古早网红”鲜芋仙近几年却一直在关店,距离高峰期关店200多家,门店停留在近600家,去年有部分区域代理商还被传出运营不善、欠租被追讨的传闻。

鲜芋仙在此时选择将品牌拱手让人。“不管卖给谁千万别倒了,甜品胃就算吃完饭都要吃一碗芋圆。”有消费者表达了惋惜。

“起了大早,赶了晚集”的鲜芋仙,为何卖在了风口刚起的节点上?CFB能救鲜芋仙吗?

“招牌芋圆”曾年销千万份,鲜芋仙输给了自己

2007年,一对从中国台湾的台中市走出来的傅氏姐弟,用一碗芋圆和仙草,开了一家名叫“鲜芋仙”的甜品店。

彼时标准化甜品连锁在市场中尚属稀缺,它的手作质感、既传统又精致的调性迅速积累了口碑。巅峰时期,鲜芋仙全球门店超过800家,以芋圆、红豆、珍珠、芋头组合的核心产品“芋圆四号”年销量一度突破1000万份。

鲜芋仙在2010年代中期迎来了它的时代,但从2019年开始,它就陷入连年闭店的困境。据窄门餐眼数据,2023年,鲜芋仙关闭了260家门店,是近年来门店流失最大的一年。创立近20年,如今鲜芋仙的门店停留在600家,而比它更晚诞生的蜜雪冰城、古茗等奶茶品牌早已跑过万店。

《天下网商》发现,“好吃”“分量少”“贵”是社交平台上消费者对其较常见的评价。分量缩水、新品上新慢、缺乏主动出击的消费者沟通,成为鲜芋仙在糖水赛道逐渐沉寂的原因。

芋圆、仙草、豆花,这套产品逻辑在十多年前是差异化,但到了如今早已不再新鲜。

即便鲜芋仙近几年也在通过草莓系列、杨梅系列等季节限定推出新品,但核心SKU几乎没有变化,在快速更迭的市场也缺乏具有记忆度的新爆款。

但凭借手作温度与经典产品,鲜芋仙还是留存了不少拥趸。产品功力扎实,或许是鲜芋仙虽然不温不火但也能坚持20多年的原因,也是CFB愿意接盘的关键。凭借“新鲜、现煮、现卖”的手作概念,充满古早味的鲜芋仙依然能吸引很多80、90后,以承载那份儿时的情感记忆。

《天下网商》发现,鲜芋仙的经典芋圆系列25元起步,若额外加点小料,单价很容易超过40元。相比之下,赵记传承和麦记牛奶十几元起步的价格就显得亲民了许多。赵记传承甚至还出了“糖水+车仔面”“糖水+鸡翅”的小食及餐饮套餐,价格为30元上下。

当产品的稀缺性被稀释,相对的高价就会显得刺眼。更何况,9.9元的奶茶咖啡也正不断冲击鲜芋仙的消费场景。

这或许是鲜芋仙被收购的背景,站在一个回暖但竞争更激烈的市场里,一个古早品牌等待一个能帮它重新出发的接盘者。

CFB爆改鲜芋仙,"大享乐"版图扩宽

要理解这笔交易,还需要看CFB是什么来头。

CFB集团成立于2003年,其官方注册名称和运营主体为可纳客(上海)餐饮管理有限公司,核心资产是约1400家DQ大中华区南方特许经营权以及近300家棒约翰的中国特许经营权,另外还有休闲西餐品牌Brut Eatery悦璞食堂和高端面馆金玡居。

2013年,殷拓集团收购CFB约57%的股份,开启机构化运营;2021至2022年,方源资本以约1.6亿美元接手,进入整合深化期。

方源资本接手的五年,是CFB迅速发展的五年。

DQ是其中最关键的验证。截至2025年12月,DQ在中国市场的门店突破1800家,稳居中国连锁冰淇淋品牌第一,与第二名哈根达斯的差距持续拉大。彼时哈根达斯已从鼎盛期萎缩至250余家。2025年全年,CFB集团中国市场业务营收和利润均实现双位数增长。DQ单店销售额同比增长11%,旗下各品牌平均同店增长在7%-8%之间。

增长背后,CFB展现了强大的产品上新及私域运营能力。2025年,DQ推出超150款新品,新品销售额占比65%。从抓住社交媒体热点的迪拜巧克力风味冰淇淋,到《疯狂动物城2》上映期间的“邦邦硬暴风雪”系列,DQ团队对市场热点和用户心理的把握敏锐,反应迅速。

CFB的入主,或许对于如今的鲜芋仙来说恰逢其时——可以提供一套在中国市场已经被验证过的连锁运营体系,包括标准化改造能力、供应链整合经验、数字化营运管理,以及更低线平稳拓店的渠道下沉能力。

CFB集团CEO许惟抡有个“大享乐”理论:把冰淇淋、甜品、蛋糕烘焙、茶饮、咖啡定义为“大享乐品类”,它们的共同特征是提供情绪价值而非饱腹功能。消费频次从低到高依次排列,每向高频品类扩展一格,集团的营收天花板就抬高一格。

按照这个逻辑,鲜芋仙是CFB版图里缺少的那一格:中式甜品。

此前CFB有个困扰,主力业务是季节性的,充满波动。DQ的主产品是冰淇淋,夏季热卖、冬季遇冷。虽然近年来DQ通过进军汉堡赛道、推出手工定制蛋糕来补足全时段经营,但季节性波动的结构性短板从未被消除。更大的问题是,CFB的品类版图里没有中式甜品,而这个品类在2025年刚好迎来了它多年来最大的回潮。

收购后,CFB的总门店规模从约1850家跃升至约2500家。鲜芋仙的核心产品兼具冷热两种形态,能弥补DQ的季节性波动,且两个品牌的客群重合度高,客单价接近,顾客可以在同一个消费场景里内部流转而不外溢。

目前,CFB已官宣,鲜芋仙全新风格门店将在4月底正式亮相,同时推出一系列品牌焕新动作,包括参照DQ经验的一系列在地文化主题店,比如融入熊猫和川剧变脸元素的成都店、引入古城墙元素的西安门店。

连锁餐饮行业的增长逻辑变了

就在CFB集团宣布入股鲜芋仙母公司休闲国联,成为其最大及控股股东的两个月前,CFB的控股方方源资本刚刚被彭博社报道正在考虑出售CFB,估值约5亿美元。

一边准备卖,一边继续买。看起来矛盾,其实是私募的标准动作。

方源资本于2021年以1.6亿美元入主CFB,四年之间增值约212%。这是一个漂亮的回报数字,也是一个随时可以启动退出流程的信号。

从这个角度来说,CFB买下鲜芋仙的动机又多了一层深意。

在一笔普通的战略收购之外,这也是一次“退出前的估值优化”,通过品类补齐和门店规模跃升,把CFB从“西式餐饮运营商”定义为“综合餐饮平台”,让资产的故事更完整、更有价值。

CFB收购鲜芋仙其实是餐饮行业一个更大叙事的缩影。

过去十年,餐饮连锁的增长逻辑简单粗暴,通过跑马圈地,以开店速度换市场份额。喜茶在一线城市塑造调性,瑞幸咖啡以补贴换用户规模,蜜雪冰城靠极致供应链控制成本然后密集开店……这些故事的背后都是单品牌的规模扩张。

但随着市场逐渐饱和,单一品牌的天花板正在变得清晰可见。这决定了资本需要启用另一套叙事,从规模化扩张切换到品牌矩阵逻辑。

蓝瓶咖啡被大钲资本收入囊中,与旗下瑞幸咖啡一起铺就从平价大众到精品小众咖啡的完整版图;百胜中国用肯德基、必胜客、小肥羊覆盖了正餐赛道的三个价格带;喜茶做高端茶饮,从追求开店数量到追求单店质量的同时,投了赵记传承去占位中式糖水——这背后都是用同样的逻辑,尽可能覆盖更多层次的消费者,以及消费者更多场景和时间。

对于鲜芋仙来说,同样来自中国台湾,比喜茶、奈雪更早出现的“新茶饮鼻祖”贡茶,或许是一个值得借鉴的样本。在美国私募TA Associates持有7年后,它正在以约20亿美元(约合人民币140亿元)的估值寻求出售,比买入时增值近6倍。

它的路径是把单一品牌做成了跨越32个国家和地区、门店超2400家的全球资产,跑通了另一条路线——把一个品牌做深、做出溢价,然后高位套现。

由此可见,在存量博弈时代,对品牌拥有者而言,当经营遭遇瓶颈时,卖给资本,借助其资金和全球化视野实现“借船出海”或“焕发新生”,越来越成为一种主流选择。

无论是借鉴DQ经验在CFB旗下抓住眼下中式糖水的机会重新翻红,或者是成为CFB“大享乐”板块中的其中一个拼图抬高其整体估值,对于二者来说,都是不错的结局。

注:文/章航英,文章来源:天下网商(公众号ID:txws_txws),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

【版权提示】亿邦动力倡导尊重与保护知识产权。未经许可,任何人不得复制、转载、或以其他方式使用本网站的内容。如发现本站文章存在版权问题,烦请提供版权疑问、身份证明、版权证明、联系方式等发邮件至run@ebrun.com,我们将及时沟通与处理。

已点赞

+1

{{ praise_text }}

好文章,值得被更多人看到

FAQ回顾

鲜芋仙为什么会被CFB集团收购?

鲜芋仙因产品创新不足、价格偏高、市场竞争加剧导致门店收缩,而CFB集团看中其扎实的产品基础,希望将其纳入旗下以补齐中式甜品品类,完善其“大享乐”品牌矩阵,并利用自身运营经验帮助鲜芋仙重振。

CFB集团收购鲜芋仙后有哪些整合计划?

CFB计划对鲜芋仙进行品牌焕新,包括推出新风格门店、打造在地文化主题店(如成都熊猫店、西安古城墙店),并利用其在DQ品牌上已验证的标准化、供应链和数字化运营体系来提升鲜芋仙的竞争力。

当前连锁餐饮行业的增长逻辑发生了什么变化?

行业增长逻辑正从单一品牌的规模化扩张,转向构建覆盖不同价格带和消费场景的品牌矩阵,以覆盖更广泛的客群并提升整体估值,如百胜中国、喜茶投资赵记传承等案例所示。

广告

下一篇

征集报名《品牌数字化服务商资源手册》

《品牌数字化服务商资源手册》展示数字化服务商风采,亿邦全年零售大会通发,触达更多资源,马上加入!

马上入驻

今日头条鼻祖要破产了

这便是BuzzFeed的经历,一家被称作是“今日头条鼻祖”的内容平台,曾首创算法推荐席卷全球,昔日市值高达17亿美元,如今只剩下不到3000万美元,不但收到退市警告,也走到了破产边缘。

BuzzFeed 未来零售

2026-05-05 07:23:31