232亿巴黎水被卖了

作者：张雪文章来源：投中网

2026-07-27 09:47

作者：张雪文章来源：投中网

2026-07-27 09:47

邦小白快读

全文速览

本次核心事件是雀巢将旗下包括巴黎水、圣培露在内的30余个水与高端饮料品牌，与私募机构Platinum Equity成立各持股50%的合资公司，雀巢交割后获得约232亿人民币现金，这是雀巢近年收缩水业务的最后一步。

1. 交易背景：雀巢近年逐步剥离非核心水业务，先后出售中国大陆饮用水业务、北美水业务，核心战略是聚焦30个左右高利润核心品牌，把低利润率业务的资金转移到更高收益的业务板块。

2. 行业现状：当前全球瓶装水增速整体放缓，欧洲受环保法规约束增速仅1.2%，中国高端水2024年线下销售额同比下滑16%，巴黎水等高端进口水价格大幅下跌，消费者决策从盲目认国际品牌转向关注配料、源地、矿物质含量，原有高端水的品牌光环正在持续褪去。

本次交易和瓶装水行业的格局变化，能给各类水饮品牌商提供多维度的参考干货。

1. 消费趋势变化：当前全球瓶装水整体增速收窄，中国市场全行业增速仅约0.2%，高端水赛道持续下滑，消费者价格敏感度明显提升，决策逻辑从认品牌转向关注配料、源地等核心属性，原有高端品牌的溢价空间被持续压缩。

2. 企业战略启发：头部品牌要及时优化资产结构，主动剥离低利润率的非核心业务，把资源集中到高收益的核心品牌上，雀巢出售水业务腾挪资金投向更高利润业务的操作，符合资本市场资产优化的逻辑，对多品牌集团有参考价值。

3. 竞争格局提示：当前中国水市场“二八效应”愈发固化，头部本土品牌占据近半份额，新品牌和老品牌都需要调整叙事逻辑，贴合消费者新需求重构品牌竞争力。

本次行业变化和交易信息，给水饮卖家带来了明确的机会提示和风险预警，可指导后续运营调整。

1. 市场需求变化：全球瓶装水整体增速放缓，但亚太地区是全球增量核心，中国、印度、东南亚贡献了该区域超六成增量；国内市场中，气泡水需求下滑约20%，功能电解质水、平价含糖茶、基础瓶装水需求更稳定。

2. 风险提示：高端进口水的原有溢价逻辑已经失效，巴黎水、依云等头部高端水价格持续下探，卖家如果继续押注高端进口水，很可能面临库存积压、利润缩水的风险，需要及时调整备货结构。

3. 机会提示：消费者越来越关注水源、配料等差异化属性，主打本土优质水源、健康概念的水饮有更多突围机会；国际巨头持续剥离水业务，也给中小卖家留出了细分市场的增长空间。

本次交易和行业变化，对饮用水生产工厂的产品布局和业务拓展有明确的启发意义。

1. 产品生产设计调整方向：当前消费者不再盲目崇拜国际高端品牌，更关注产品的配料表、水源地、矿物质含量，工厂在产品研发生产阶段，就要突出这些消费者关心的核心卖点，打造差异化产品，贴合市场新需求。

2. 行业特性提示：瓶装水属于典型的重资产、长链条生意，水源维护、灌装生产、物流配送的成本都很高，整体利润率偏低，工厂要避免盲目扩张产能，优先控制生产成本，不要重蹈雀巢庞大品牌矩阵的负担覆辙。

3. 商业机会：国际巨头持续剥离有品牌价值但被边缘化的水业务，接盘方需要优质的生产供应链支持，工厂可以通过代工合作、收购成熟品牌等方式盘活资源，拓展自身业务边界，依托原有品牌基础打开市场。

从本次交易和行业发展趋势来看，瓶装水行业整合催生了大量新的服务需求，给服务商带来了明确的方向。

1. 行业发展趋势：全球瓶装水行业整合加速，头部食品巨头不断剥离非核心低利润业务，PE机构成为主要接盘方，这类机构接盘后普遍需要做运营优化，催生了大量第三方服务需求。

2. 客户核心痛点：当前瓶装水企业的核心痛点集中在三个方面：一是重资产模式下生产成本、物流成本高，整体利润率偏低，降本需求强烈；二是原有高端品牌营销逻辑失效，需要重新定位匹配消费者新需求；三是环保法规趋严，合规成本不断上升。

3. 业务拓展方向：服务商可以针对性推出供应链降本优化方案、品牌重构营销服务、环保合规解决方案，既可以对接PE机构接盘后的业务优化需求，也可以服务本土新品牌的突围需求，挖掘新的业务增长点。

本次瓶装水行业的格局变化和交易动态，对平台水饮品类的招商、运营和风险规避都有参考价值。

1. 品类招商调整：当前高端进口水需求持续下滑，功能电解质水、平价含糖茶、基础瓶装水需求稳定，消费者更偏好有差异化卖点的本土水饮，平台需要调整品类招商结构，加大对本土差异化水饮的招商力度，匹配市场需求变化。

2. 运营调整方向：高端进口水的品牌溢价持续缩水，价格不断下探，平台需要及时调整品类价格带布局，优化品类陈列资源分配，适配当前的价格变化和需求结构。

3. 风险规避：国内水饮整体增速极低，高端水连续多年下滑，平台要避免过度引入高端进口水，规避流量下滑和库存积压的风险；同时可以抓住国际巨头剥离业务留出的市场空间，引入本土新兴品牌丰富品类矩阵，抓住结构性增长机会。

雀巢出售巴黎水等水业务的交易，反映了全球瓶装水产业的诸多新动向、新问题，是产业研究的典型样本。

1. 产业新动向：全球头部食品企业正在开启新一轮业务收缩，主动剥离低利润率非核心业务，聚焦高毛利核心品牌；PE机构的并购加运营模式，也就是Platinum Equity的M&A&O模式，越来越多应用在消费领域，接盘大企业剥离的成熟业务已经形成可复制的路径，达能、雀巢的合作就是典型案例。

2. 产业新问题：瓶装水行业整体增速放缓，环保法规收紧推高行业合规和生产成本，消费者决策逻辑发生根本性转变，原有高端水的溢价体系正在崩塌，中国市场头部固化“二八效应”明显，行业整体利润率持续下滑，这些都是产业层面需要研究的新问题。

3. 新格局：国际水品牌主导的时代已经结束，本土品牌依托对消费者需求的理解正在抢占市场，行业结构性重构已经发生，值得深入研究。

声明：快读内容全程由AI生成，请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题，请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是品牌商卖家工厂服务商平台商研究者帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

The core news this time is that Nestlé has established a 50-50 joint venture with private equity firm Platinum Equity for over 30 of its water and premium beverage brands including Perrier and San Pellegrino. Nestlé received around 23.2 billion RMB in cash after closing the deal, marking the final step in Nestlé’s years-long strategic contraction of its water business.

1. Transaction background: In recent years, Nestlé has gradually divested its non-core water assets, having previously sold its mainland China water business and North American water business. Its core strategy is to focus on around 30 high-margin flagship brands, and reallocate capital from low-margin businesses to higher-return segments.

2. Current industry landscape: The overall growth of the global bottled water market is slowing. Regulated by strict environmental legislation, the European market is only growing at 1.2%; China’s premium bottled water segment saw a 16% year-on-year decline in offline sales in 2024, and prices of imported premium waters like Perrier have dropped sharply. Consumers are no longer blindly loyal to international brands, and now pay more attention to ingredients, water sources and mineral content. The brand premium of traditional premium imported waters is continuing to erode.

This transaction and the ongoing shifts in the bottled water industry offer multi-dimensional insights for all types of water and beverage brands.

1. Shifting consumer trends: The overall growth of the global bottled water market is narrowing, with the entire Chinese industry growing just 0.2%. The premium water segment is in continuous decline, and consumers have become significantly more price-sensitive. Their purchasing decisions now focus on core attributes like ingredients and water sources rather than brand names, which has steadily compressed the premium space historically enjoyed by established high-end brands.

2. Strategic takeaways for enterprises: Leading brands should proactively optimize their asset structure by divesting low-margin non-core businesses, and concentrate resources on high-return core brands. Nestlé’s move to free up capital for higher-profit businesses by selling off water assets aligns with capital market principles for asset optimization, and serves as a useful reference for multi-brand groups.

3. Notes on competitive landscape: The "80/20 effect" in China’s water market is becoming increasingly entrenched, with leading domestic brands holding nearly half of the total market share. Both established and new brands need to adjust their brand narrative and rebuild competitiveness around consumers’ new demands.

This transaction and industry shift deliver clear opportunity signals and risk warnings for water beverage sellers, and can guide operational adjustments going forward.

1. Shifting market demand: While overall global bottled water growth is slowing, the Asia-Pacific region remains the core driver of global incremental growth, with China, India and Southeast Asia contributing more than 60% of the region’s growth. Within China’s domestic market, demand for sparkling water has fallen around 20%, while demand for functional electrolyte water, affordable sugary tea and basic bottled water has remained far more stable.

2. Risk warning: The traditional premium logic for imported water no longer holds, and prices of leading premium brands like Perrier and Evian continue to decline. Sellers that continue to bet heavily on premium imported water face high risks of inventory backlog and shrinking margins, and should adjust their product assortment promptly.

3. Opportunity outlook: As consumers increasingly value differentiated attributes such as water source and ingredients, water beverages highlighting high-quality domestic water sources and health positioning have greater opportunities to stand out. Additionally, the ongoing divestments of water businesses by global giants have left room for small and medium-sized sellers to grow in niche segments.

This transaction and industry shift offer clear insights for product positioning and business expansion for bottled water manufacturers.

1. Guidance for product development: Consumers no longer blindly worship international premium brands, and now prioritize ingredients, water sources and mineral content. Factories should highlight these consumer-centric core selling points in R&D and production, build differentiated products, and align with new market demands.

2. Notes on industry characteristics: Bottled water is a typical capital-intensive, long-supply-chain business, with high costs for water source maintenance, filling production and logistics distribution, leading to overall low margins. Factories should avoid blind capacity expansion, prioritize production cost control, and avoid repeating Nestlé’s mistake of bearing the burden of an overstretched brand portfolio.

3. New business opportunities: Global giants are continuously divesting branded but marginalized water businesses, and the acquirers of these assets require high-quality production and supply chain support. Factories can activate these resources through OEM partnerships or acquisitions of established brands, expand their business scope, and access new markets based on the existing brand foundation.

Viewed from this transaction and broader industry trends, the ongoing consolidation of the bottled water sector has generated substantial new service demand, creating clear direction for service providers.

1. Industry development trend: Global bottled water industry consolidation is accelerating, as leading food giants continuously divest non-core low-margin businesses, with private equity firms as the primary buyers. These PE firms generally need operational optimization after acquiring assets, which generates strong demand for third-party services.

2. Core pain points of clients: The core challenges for bottled water enterprises fall into three categories: First, the asset-heavy model leads to high production and logistics costs and low overall margins, creating strong demand for cost reduction. Second, the traditional marketing logic for premium brands is no longer effective, requiring repositioning to align with new consumer demands. Third, tightening environmental regulations are driving up compliance costs continuously.

3. Directions for business expansion: Service providers can develop targeted offerings including supply chain cost optimization solutions, brand repositioning and marketing services, and environmental compliance services. These can meet the operational optimization needs of PE firms post-acquisition, as well as support the growth of domestic emerging brands, helping service providers unlock new business growth points.

The shifting landscape of China’s bottled water industry and this transaction provide valuable reference for category sourcing, operation and risk mitigation for e-commerce marketplaces.

1. Adjustments to category sourcing: As demand for premium imported water continues to decline while demand for functional electrolyte water, affordable sugary tea and basic bottled water stays stable, and consumers increasingly prefer differentiated domestic water beverages, marketplaces should adjust their category sourcing strategy by increasing recruitment of domestic brands with differentiated offerings to match changing market demand.

2. Operational adjustments: The brand premium of premium imported water continues to shrink, with prices falling steadily. Marketplaces should adjust their price tier layout for the category and optimize the allocation of display resources to adapt to current price changes and demand structure.

3. Risk mitigation: Given the extremely low overall growth of China’s domestic water market and years of continuous decline in the premium segment, marketplaces should avoid over-sourcing premium imported water to mitigate risks of traffic decline and inventory backlog. At the same time, they can capitalize on the market space created by global giants’ divestments by introducing domestic emerging brands to enrich their category matrix and capture structural growth opportunities.

Nestlé’s divestment of water brands including Perrier serves as a representative case study of new trends and issues emerging in the global bottled water industry.

1. New industry trends: Leading global food companies are launching a new round of strategic contraction, actively divesting low-margin non-core businesses to focus on high-margin core brands. The "M&A&O" (Mergers and Acquisitions & Operations) model practiced by Platinum Equity, where PE firms combine acquisitions with active operational improvement, is increasingly applied in the consumer sector. A replicable path has formed for PE firms to acquire mature businesses divested by large corporations, with the partnerships with Danone and Nestlé serving as prime examples.

2. New industry challenges: Overall growth of the bottled water industry is slowing, and stricter environmental regulations have pushed up compliance and production costs. Consumer decision-making logic has fundamentally changed, and the premium pricing system of traditional high-end water is collapsing. In China’s market, the entrenched 80/20 market concentration and continued declining industry margins all represent new structural issues that require further research.

3. New industry structure: The era dominated by international water brands has ended. Domestic brands are gaining market share by leveraging a better understanding of local consumer demand, and a structural industry restructuring is already underway that merits in-depth research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

最终杀出重围的是Platinum Equity。

一笔酝酿近两年的交易终于落定。圣培露、巴黎水等知名苏打水品牌，将打包装入一家新公司，合资公司估值约49亿欧元（约378亿人民币）。

近日，雀巢与私募股权机构Platinum Equity宣布，将设立合资公司Peranel，双方各持50%股权，将雀巢旗下全部水与高端饮料业务装入其中，合资公司企业估值49亿欧元，交割后雀巢预计获得约30亿欧元（约232亿人民币）现金。

被装入的资产名单很长，圣培露、巴黎水、普娜以及雀巢优活、功能性补水饮料品牌和地方性水品牌，总计超过30个品牌，销往120个国家。其中前三个在高端餐饮和五星级酒店里几乎无处不在。

关于这笔交易，投中网曾在三个月前有过报道，当时雀巢的潜在合资方包括KKR、PAI Partners、Dubilier&Rice等多家机构，只是让人没想到的是，最终杀出重围的是Platinum Equity。

一个擅长“打扫战场”的PE巨头

对大多数人来说，Platinum Equity是一个陌生的名字，它虽不像黑石、KKR那样让人耳熟能详，但在一级市场的并购领域，却有着独特的打法和深厚的积累。

据公开资料，Platinum Equity成立于1995年，由亿万富翁汤姆·戈尔斯（Tom Gores）创立并控股，总部位于洛杉矶，管理资产规模约480亿美元，投资组合涵盖约60家运营公司。

三十年间，它完成了超过500笔收购，它的核心方法论叫“M&A&O”——并购、收购加运营，比一般机构多了一层运营业务。

具体地，它不追求赛道风口，也不押注明星创业者，而是专攻大企业要剥离的非核心业务。买下来之后，Platinum Equity会把精力投入到运营优化上，包括改善供应链、精简管理层、重新制定市场策略，让一个“弃子”重新活过来。

谈到这，其实我们会发现国内很多机构也在做这些事情，像是高瓴、德弘等。

当然雀巢的水业务正好符合Platinum Equity的标的画像，一个在大集团体系内被边缘化、但本身仍然有盈利能力和品牌价值的业务单元。

那么最后为何是Platinum Equity？一位交易的知情者谈到“这笔交易并不简单”。

正如我们之前所看到，在这场交易的早期阶段，竞争格局一度非常热闹。

今年3月，KKR、PAI Partners、CD&R三家机构同时入围首轮竞标。其中，PAI Partners尤为引人注目，这是因为它是雀巢的长期战略合作伙伴，双方在冰淇淋业务合资公司Froneri、欧洲冷冻披萨业务等多个板块已有深度合作，市场一度将其视为头号热门。

但局势很快明朗。6月初，PAI Partners率先宣布退出，原因未公开，但业内分析指向双方对资产估值和后续运营决策权的分歧，紧接着KKR退出，6月下旬CD&R也退了场。至此，群雄逐鹿变成了一枝独秀。Platinum Equity成为唯一剩下的买家。

所以，从竞标过程来看，Platinum Equity拿下这笔交易的方式并不浪漫，它是剩下来的，而不是赢下来的。不过这倒未必是坏事，毕竟当竞争对手因估值分歧和运营复杂度退场，笑到最后的那家往往在定价上足够理性、在运营上足够自信。

另一方面，Platinum Equity的独特打法在消费行业也是屡屡奏效。比如它此前投资了欧洲饼干制造商Biscuit International、有机乳制品企业Horizon Organic，以及美国中西部家电零售商Grand Appliance。

在企业分拆合资方面，它曾与Ball Corporation、卡特彼勒、达能、艾默生电气、科勒、澳大利亚电信Telstra等多家大型企业设立过类似Peranel的合作架构。其中，达能的案例尤其值得关注，这家法国食品巨头与Platinum的分拆合作经验，某种程度上为雀巢交易提供了可参照的范本。

这也从侧面说明，剩下的未必是不好的，没准还是最佳选择。

估值378亿的饮料巨头

此前，投中网在《巴黎水要卖了》一文中详细介绍了雀巢水帝国的起落和出售的原因，在此不再详细展开。

简单概括，34年前，想扩张瓶装水业务的雀巢以153亿法郎的高价收购了当时陷入危机的巴黎水。此后，雀巢一跃成为全球高端水市场的领导者，并在接下来的几年买下了意大利的圣培露和普娜，逐步将高端水市场的版图扩张至140多个国家。至2000年初，雀巢旗下瓶装水品牌一度接近51个，形成了从国际高端品牌到全球主流品牌再到区域强势品牌的庞大多层次矩阵。

然而，最近几年，雀巢对瓶装水业务的偏爱突然消失。

第一刀先砍向了中国市场，2020年8月，雀巢将中国大陆饮用水业务打包卖给青岛啤酒集团，此后，雀巢在中国的水业务只剩下巴黎水、氼颂家巴黎水和圣培露三个高端品牌，由代理商捷成饮料负责总经销，转为彻底的轻资产模式。第二刀则是挥至了北美，2021年，雀巢以43亿美元的价格将北美区域性泉水品牌、纯净水业务及送水服务出售给One Rock Capital。

至此，欧洲高端水业务成为雀巢手中最后一块水业务拼图，而它在2026年7月的这一天，也被装进了合资公司。

虽然瓶装水业务的出售理由，离不开低利润率和水质丑闻，但更直接的还是雀巢整体的重组战略。

2024年9月，Laurent Freixe接手雀巢CEO一职后，就开始了全面的业务收缩。他的计划是，将资源集中在约30个核心品牌上，同时把外围业务一件件剥离，除了前文提到的瓶装水和冰淇淋外，今年早些时候，他还将蓝瓶咖啡卖给了大钲资本，如今雀巢旗下的维生素品牌也被列入了下一个待售品。

这其中的逻辑也很清楚，卖掉10亿瑞郎利润率的生意，把多出来的钱投进40亿瑞郎利润率的生意里，资本市场的算术题从来都是如此直白。

当然，这笔交易对Platinum Equity来说挑战也显而易见。

合资公司Peranel的总部设在巴黎，由现任雀巢水业务CEO Muriel Lienau继续领导，这意味着管理层的稳定性得到了保证，但硬币的另一面，也暗示了新股东推行变革的空间会受到既有体系和文化的束缚。

在财务层面，合资公司的债务规模被报道达到20亿至30亿欧元。PE机构的经典操作是通过杠杆放大回报，可在当下利率环境下这是否仍然奏效，仍然有待验证。

一个事实是，瓶装水是典型的重资产、长链条生意，水源地的获取和维护、灌装线的运营、物流配送的成本，每一项都沉重而难以压缩。而投资机构追求财务回报的天然压力，是否牺牲品质，牺牲工艺，是巴黎水未来必须面对的不确定性。

因此，Peranel是一个巨大的赌注。它手上握着全球最具品牌辨识度的水品牌组合之一，但也要直面一个增速放缓、监管趋严、消费者信任动摇的市场。

瓶装水还是一门好生意吗？

雀巢的撤退，放在更大的行业背景下来看，并非孤例，也并非偶然。

宏观层面上，全球瓶装水市场仍在增长，但增速正在收窄，结构正在分化。2025年，全球瓶装水零售规模突破3250亿美元，2026年预计攀升至3420亿美元左右。尽管绝对数字依然庞大，但增长速度已从过去的5%-6%区间回落，尤其是欧洲市场在一次性塑料指令等环保法规的约束下，总销量增速已放缓至1.2%。

相比之下，亚太地区以约38.5%的消费量占比持续领跑全球，中国、印度和东南亚贡献了该区域超过六成的增量。

中国市场则呈现出更为复杂的图景。2025年国内包装饮用水全行业增速仅约0.2%，包装饮用水品类增速约3%，多个月份甚至出现负增长。

写这篇文章时，我正好看到界面新闻的报道《今年饮料不好卖了》，文中引用了一个超市经营者的现身说法：“今年最难卖的是气泡水，下滑了差不多20%，倒是碳酸饮料尤其是可口可乐并没有下滑太多。店里卖得最好的是东方树叶、外星人电解质水。其次是冰红茶、冰茶等单价相对低一些的含糖茶饮料；此外，瓶装水的需求最稳定。”

深层的变化发生在竞争格局和价格带上。农夫山泉、华润怡宝、景田百岁山三大品牌占据近半壁江山，"二八效应"愈发固化。高端水市场更是寒意逼人。尼尔森IQ数据显示，2024年中国高端水线下渠道销售额同比下滑16%，这一趋势在2025年并未出现逆转信号。

这次的交易主角巴黎水，曾经在五星级酒店卖到40元一瓶、商超货架上稳定在10元以上的330ml巴黎水，2025年部分渠道价格已跌至5.9元，在天猫超市，24瓶装折合每瓶仅5.1元。同时，另一个高端品牌依云的电商零售价已跌破3元门槛。

品牌溢价空间被持续压缩，经济周期压力下消费者的价格敏感度上升，更重要的，人们对健康饮水的需求越来越高，消费者从看品牌转向看配料表、看源地、看矿物质含量，这一结构性转变的正在改写这个赛道曾经最核心的叙事。

巴黎水的“奢侈饮料”光环，正在肉眼可见地褪去。即便巴黎水的绿色玻璃瓶还会留在餐馆的桌面上，但它所代表的那个水帝国时代，已经结束。

注：文/张雪，文章来源：投中网(公众号ID：China-Venture)，本文为作者独立观点，不代表亿邦动力立场。

【版权提示】亿邦动力倡导尊重与保护知识产权。未经许可，任何人不得复制、转载、或以其他方式使用本网站的内容。如发现本站文章存在版权问题，烦请提供版权疑问、身份证明、版权证明、联系方式等发邮件至run@ebrun.com，我们将及时沟通与处理。

已点赞

好文章,值得被更多人看到

FAQ回顾

Platinum Equity是什么机构？

Platinum Equity是1995年由汤姆·戈尔斯创立的私募股权机构，总部位于洛杉矶，管理资产规模约480亿美元，投资组合涵盖约60家运营公司，核心打法为「M&A&O」，专攻大企业剥离的非核心业务，收购后会通过运营优化盘活资产。

雀巢为什么要出售旗下水业务资产？

雀巢出售水业务主要是出于整体重组战略，2024年9月新CEO上任后推进业务收缩，计划将资源集中在约30个核心品牌上，剥离低利润率的外围业务，将资金投入到利润率更高的业务板块，提升整体盈利能力。

当前中国高端水市场现状如何？

尼尔森IQ数据显示2024年中国高端水线下渠道销售额同比下滑16%，2025年未出现逆转信号，高端水品牌溢价持续压缩，巴黎水等产品价格明显下跌，消费者饮水需求转向看重配料、水源地、矿物质含量等实际指标。

全球瓶装水市场当前发展趋势是怎样的？

全球瓶装水市场规模仍在增长但增速收窄，2026年预计达3420亿美元，增速从过往5%-6%区间回落，欧洲市场受环保法规约束总销量增速仅1.2%，亚太地区以38.5%的消费量占比持续领跑全球。

标签:: 未来零售

一年覆盖2万学生后学而思“给孩子的一节AI课”为何还在升级？

?“我长大了想当语文老师”“我长大后要当总裁”“我长大后要当医生，AI能不能帮我治好更多病人”……之后学生们亲手用AI生成了自己20年后的“职业照”。

品牌故事未来零售

2026-07-27 09:40:01