• 亿邦公众号
    • APP下载

百度智能云发布“产业智能体操作系统”:一张企业智能化船票

作者:林岩 文章来源:子弹财经

2026-09-18 09:38

作者:林岩 文章来源:子弹财经

2026-09-18 09:38

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

你可以第一时间掌握2026年AI行业发展的核心趋势,以及和企业、职场人相关的智能化落地干货。

1. 行业竞争已进入新阶段:2023-2024年行业比拼大模型参数能力,2025年聚焦办公、编程等单点智能体应用,2026年竞争重心已下沉至智能体基础设施层,谷歌、微软、百度均已推出对应企业级智能体平台或操作系统,解决智能体规模化管理、成本控制、安全合规问题。

2. 智能体的应用价值远不止办公场景:除了写周报、做PPT等日常事务,产业智能体还可沉淀企业员工经验,避免人员流失带来的知识断层,将跨部门数据分析周期从一周压缩至分钟级提升决策效率,帮助企业构建基于智能体生态的长期竞争壁垒。

3. 当前落地进展明确:这套体系不需要企业推翻原有信息化系统重建,可渐进式激活存量资产,目前已有80%央企、超800家金融机构接入使用,预计2030年将有30亿个产业智能体持续运行。

品牌商可从文章中把握AI智能化落地的明确趋势,找到适配自身的数字化升级、效率提升路径。

1. 智能化升级不用盲目试错:当前零散的单点AI工具已无法满足规模化部署需求,品牌可依托成熟的产业智能体操作系统,不用推翻已投入建设的ERP、CRM、知识库等存量信息化资产,通过轻量接入就能渐进式完成智能化升级,清晰核算投入产出比,同时满足数据安全、国产化的合规要求。

2. 全场景效率提升空间清晰:三类智能体可分别覆盖20%的日常运营事务、30%的营销、开发、数据分析等共性专业场景、50%的品牌核心经营流程,既可以沉淀员工经验避免知识流失,也能将跨部门数据汇总分析的周期从按周计算压缩到分钟级,大幅提升决策效率。

3. 长期竞争逻辑发生变化:未来品牌的竞争壁垒将从人才数量比拼转向智能体生态质量比拼,智能体在业务中持续迭代会形成越用越强的正向循环,其中配套的专业营销智能体可直接赋能品牌营销环节。

智能体相关赛道的经营者可从文中把握明确的市场增长机会、生态合作规则与经营避坑提示。

1. 增长市场空间足够广阔:当前智能体需求正从模型训练转向长期生产运行,2030年预计将有30亿个产业智能体持续运行,带来超100吉瓦级的推理算力需求,今年上半年百度智能云AI云基础设施收入同比增长50%、GPU云收入增长283%,80%央企、超800家金融机构、全部主流车企都已启动相关布局,企业级智能体服务市场正快速扩容。

2. 生态合作门槛低、政策友好:百度最新发布的搭子生态开发平台覆盖智能体从配置、上线到运行管理的全生命周期,且承诺生态永久不抽佣,相关从业者可依托平台开发各垂直场景的定制化智能体,无需承担平台抽成成本。

3. 经营风险提示:单点零散的智能体工具已遇到增长天花板,企业客户更需要可打通存量系统、权限可管、行为可追溯、合规安全的整体方案,经营中要避免只做单点功能,主动适配主流基础设施底座的接入标准。

生产制造类工厂可从文中找到低门槛的智能化转型路径,同时把握智能体算力建设带来的配套商业机会。

1. 智能化转型可渐进式落地,不用承担推倒重建的成本:工厂无需废弃已投入多年建设的生产管理系统、ERP、工艺知识库等存量信息化资产,可通过产业智能体操作系统轻量接入,用三类智能体分别覆盖日常行政运营、质检/视觉识别/代码开发等共性专业场景、工厂自有生产流程等专有场景,逐步激活存量系统价值。

2. 转型价值贴合生产实际:产业智能体可将资深技工的工艺经验、判断标准编码沉淀,避免人员流动带来的技术断层,也可拉通生产、供应链、销售各环节数据,将原来需要一周的数据分析工作压缩到分钟级,大幅提升生产决策效率。

3. 配套商业机会明确:智能体算力底座建设需要大量国产化硬件配套,百度天池超节点已开放整柜制造、供电、散热等六大核心模块技术规范,在全国多地推进千柜级智算中心部署,具备相关生产能力的工厂可对接获取订单,目前智能体方案已覆盖全部国内主流车企,制造领域落地已进入快车道。

企业服务类从业者可从文中掌握智能体赛道的行业发展趋势、客户真实痛点与成熟解决方案方向。

1. 行业发展趋势清晰:AI智能体的竞争已从模型层、单点应用层下沉到基础设施层,头部模型能力已基本趋同,单点智能体无法完成跨系统跨流程复杂任务的瓶颈已经显现,未来竞争核心是谁能帮助客户管好智能体、控制部署成本、保障安全合规。

2. 客户核心痛点明确:当前企业规模化部署智能体时普遍存在四类痛点:多部门分散部署的智能体缺乏统一授权管理、权限边界不清、问题难以追溯,智能体无法打通存量ERP、CRM等信息系统只能浮于表面,零散AI工具投入产出比难以核算,央国企等客户对数据安全、全栈国产化有硬性准入要求。

3. 落地路径可参考:百度推出的产业智能体操作系统融合三类智能体,配套全生命周期开发平台,支持存量系统轻量接入、全链路行为可追溯,生态永久不抽佣,服务商可依托该平台为垂直行业客户开发定制化智能体,降低开发成本,聚焦场景做深服务。

平台类经营者可从文中把握企业客户的真实需求、头部平台的最新运营策略与行业发展风向。

1. 企业客户对平台的需求已发生本质变化:企业不再满足于平台提供单点智能体工具,而是需要平台具备智能体全生命周期管理能力,可打通企业存量信息化系统,实现智能体权限可控、行为可追溯、成本可核算,满足数据安全与国产化合规要求,同时要支持企业渐进式升级,避免要求客户推翻原有系统重建带来的高门槛。

2. 头部平台的生态运营策略可参考:百度智能云发布搭子生态开发平台,为生态伙伴提供全流程接口支持,且承诺生态永久不抽佣,不靠交易抽成盈利,而是通过生态繁荣带动底层算力、云资源用量增长实现长期收益,构建平台与伙伴互利共生的开放生态。

3. 平台发展风向需要重视:智能体竞争已进入基础设施决胜的下半场,平台要规避只堆砌单点功能、忽略系统打通与合规能力建设的误区,构建通用、专业、定制三类智能体协同、共享统一知识底座的架构,抓住全栈国产化的准入要求打造核心竞争力。

产业研究者可从文中获取AI智能体赛道的最新产业动向、落地共性问题与商业模式创新线索。

1. 产业发展出现阶段性质变:2026年全球科技巨头不约而同将智能体业务重心从工具开发转向基础设施建设,谷歌、微软先后推出企业级智能体平台,百度智能云发布产业智能体操作系统,背后的核心驱动是头部模型能力趋同、单点智能体应用触顶、企业规模化部署痛点凸显三重因素叠加,据行业判断2030年将有30亿个产业智能体持续运行,带来超100吉瓦级推理需求,AI将真正从技术转化为经济增长动力。

2. 产业落地暴露共性新问题:企业在智能化推进中普遍面临存量信息化资产与新AI工具难以打通、分散部署的智能体难以统一管理、投入产出难以清晰核算、安全合规难以保障等问题,全栈国产化能力已从采购加分项变为央国企的准入门槛。

3. 商业模式出现新探索:百度智能云采用类操作系统的盈利逻辑,不抽取生态伙伴的交易佣金,而是依靠智能体规模化运行带动的底层算力、云资源消耗获得长期收益,相关方案已覆盖80%央企、超800家金融机构,今年上半年AI云基础设施收入同比增长50%,初步验证了模式可行性。

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article delivers a first look at the core AI industry trends for 2026, along with practical guidance on AI implementation for enterprises and working professionals.

1. Industry competition has entered a new phase: From 2023 to 2024, the sector competed on large language model parameter scale; in 2025, the focus shifted to single-purpose agent applications for use cases like office productivity and coding. By 2026, competition has moved down to the agent infrastructure layer, with Google, Microsoft, and Baidu all launching enterprise-grade agent platforms or operating systems to solve the challenges of scaled agent management, cost control, and security compliance.

2. Agent application value extends far beyond office scenarios: Beyond routine tasks such as drafting weekly reports and creating presentations, industrial agents can institutionalize employee expertise to avoid knowledge gaps caused by staff turnover, cut cross-departmental data analysis cycles from one week to minutes to accelerate decision-making, and help enterprises build long-term competitive moats rooted in agent ecosystems.

3. Implementation progress is well defined: The technology stack does not require enterprises to rebuild existing IT systems from scratch, and can incrementally activate legacy digital assets. To date, 80% of central state-owned enterprises and more than 800 financial institutions have adopted such solutions, with an estimated 3 billion industrial agents projected to be in active operation by 2030.

Brands can use insights from this article to identify clear AI implementation trends and map digital upgrade and efficiency improvement paths tailored to their operations.

1. Intelligent upgrades do not require blind trial and error: Fragmented, single-point AI tools can no longer support scaled deployment. Brands can leverage mature industrial agent operating systems to complete incremental intelligent upgrades via lightweight integration, without replacing existing legacy IT assets including ERP, CRM, and knowledge base systems. This approach allows for clear measurement of return on investment, while meeting compliance requirements for data security and domestic technology adoption.

2. Full-scenario efficiency gains are clearly mapped: Three categories of agents cover 20% of routine operational tasks, 30% of common professional scenarios such as marketing, development, and data analysis, and 50% of core brand business processes. These agents can institutionalize employee expertise to prevent knowledge loss, and compress cross-departmental data aggregation and analysis cycles from weeks to minutes, drastically improving decision-making efficiency.

3. Long-term competitive logic is shifting: Future brand competitive moats will be determined by the quality of agent ecosystems rather than headcount. Agents continuously iterate during business operations to form a positive flywheel of improving performance, with specialized marketing agents directly empowering brand marketing functions.

Operators in the agent sector can identify clear market growth opportunities, ecosystem partnership rules, and operational risk mitigation guidance from this article.

1. The market presents substantial growth upside: Agent demand is shifting from model training to long-term production operation. An estimated 3 billion industrial agents are projected to be in active use by 2030, driving more than 100 gigawatts of inference computing demand. In the first half of the year, Baidu Intelligent Cloud recorded 50% year-over-year revenue growth for its AI cloud infrastructure and 283% growth for GPU cloud services; 80% of central state-owned enterprises, over 800 financial institutions, and all mainstream automakers have launched related initiatives, driving rapid expansion of the enterprise agent services market.

2. Ecosystem partnerships feature low barriers and favorable terms: Baidu’s newly launched Dazi ecosystem development platform covers the full agent lifecycle from configuration and launch to operation and management, with a permanent zero-commission policy for ecosystem participants. Industry players can build customized agents for vertical scenarios on the platform without bearing commission costs.

3. Operational risks to note: Standalone, fragmented agent tools have hit growth ceilings, as enterprise customers now demand end-to-end solutions that integrate with legacy systems, support manageable permissions, enable behavior traceability, and meet security and compliance requirements. Operators should avoid building only single-function tools, and proactively align with the access standards of mainstream infrastructure base layers.

Manufacturing factories can identify low-barrier intelligent transformation pathways from this article, while capturing supporting business opportunities driven by agent computing power infrastructure buildout.

1. Intelligent transformation can be deployed incrementally without costly full rebuilds: Factories do not need to abandon legacy IT assets built over years, including production management systems, ERP, and process knowledge bases. Through lightweight integration with industrial agent operating systems, three categories of agents can cover daily administrative operations, common professional scenarios such as quality inspection, visual recognition, and code development, and factory-specific production processes, progressively unlocking the value of existing systems.

2. Transformation value aligns with practical production needs: Industrial agents can codify and institutionalize senior technicians’ process expertise and judgment standards to prevent technology gaps caused by staff turnover. They can also integrate data across production, supply chain, and sales links, reducing formerly week-long data analysis workflows to minutes and drastically improving production decision efficiency.

3. Supporting business opportunities are clearly defined: Agent computing base construction requires large volumes of domestic hardware supply. Baidu’s Tianchi Super Node has opened technical specifications for six core modules including full-cabinet manufacturing, power supply, and thermal management, and is deploying thousand-cabinet intelligent computing centers across multiple regions in China. Factories with relevant production capacity can pursue these orders. Agent solutions currently cover all major domestic automakers, signaling accelerated adoption in the manufacturing sector.

Enterprise service practitioners can gain insight into agent industry development trends, real customer pain points, and proven solution directions from this article.

1. Industry development trends are clear: AI agent competition has moved down the stack from the model layer and single-point application layer to the infrastructure layer. Capabilities of leading models have largely converged, and the limitation of standalone agents in completing cross-system, cross-process complex tasks has become apparent. Future competition will center on who can help customers manage agents effectively, control deployment costs, and ensure security and compliance.

2. Core customer pain points are well defined: Enterprises currently face four common pain points when deploying agents at scale: lack of unified authorization management for agents deployed across departments, unclear permission boundaries, difficulty tracing issues, inability of agents to connect to legacy ERP, CRM and other information systems leading to superficial deployment, hard-to-measure ROI for fragmented AI tools, and mandatory access requirements for data security and full-stack domestic technology for clients including central and state-owned enterprises.

3. Proven implementation pathways are available: Baidu’s industrial agent operating system integrates three categories of agents, supports a full-lifecycle development platform, enables lightweight integration with legacy systems and full-link behavior traceability, and offers permanent zero commissions for the ecosystem. Service providers can leverage the platform to build customized agents for vertical industry clients, reduce development costs, and focus on deepening scenario-specific services.

Platform operators can identify real enterprise customer demands, the latest operational strategies of leading platforms, and industry development trends from this article.

1. Enterprise customer demands for platforms have fundamentally shifted: Enterprises no longer seek only single-point agent tools from platforms; they require full-lifecycle agent management capabilities, integration with existing enterprise IT systems, controllable agent permissions, traceable behavior, measurable costs, compliance with data security and domestic technology requirements, and support for incremental upgrades to avoid the high barrier of rebuilding existing systems from scratch.

2. Leading platform ecosystem strategies offer reference points: Baidu Intelligent Cloud launched the Dazi ecosystem development platform to provide full-process API support for ecosystem partners, with a permanent zero-commission policy. Rather than profiting from transaction commissions, the platform generates long-term revenue from growth in underlying computing power and cloud resource consumption driven by ecosystem prosperity, building an open, mutually beneficial ecosystem for the platform and its partners.

3. Key platform development trends require attention: Agent competition has entered the infrastructure-decisive second half. Platforms should avoid the pitfall of stacking single-point functions while neglecting system integration and compliance capability building. Instead, they should build an architecture where general, professional, and customized agents collaborate on a shared unified knowledge base, and leverage full-stack domestic technology access requirements to build core competitiveness.

Industry researchers can access the latest industrial developments in the AI agent sector, common implementation challenges, and emerging business model innovation insights from this article.

1. The industry has reached a stage of qualitative change: In 2026, global technology giants are collectively shifting their agent business focus from tool development to infrastructure construction. Google and Microsoft have successively launched enterprise-grade agent platforms, while Baidu Intelligent Cloud has released an industrial agent operating system. This shift is driven by three overlapping factors: converging capabilities among leading models, saturation of single-point agent applications, and prominent pain points in scaled enterprise deployment. Industry estimates project 3 billion industrial agents in active operation by 2030, driving more than 100 gigawatts of inference demand, marking the point at which AI truly evolves from a technology into a driver of economic growth.

2. Common new challenges have emerged in industrial implementation: Enterprises advancing intelligent transformation widely face difficulties integrating legacy IT assets with new AI tools, unifying management of distributed deployed agents, clearly measuring return on investment, and guaranteeing security and compliance. Full-stack domestic technology capability has evolved from a procurement bonus to a mandatory access threshold for central and state-owned enterprises.

3. New business model explorations are underway: Baidu Intelligent Cloud applies an operating system-like profit logic, forgoing transaction commissions from ecosystem partners in favor of long-term revenue from underlying computing power and cloud resource consumption driven by scaled agent operation. Its solutions now cover 80% of central state-owned enterprises and more than 800 financial institutions, with 50% year-over-year revenue growth in AI cloud infrastructure in the first half of the year, providing initial validation of the model’s feasibility.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

2026年,AI行业最热闹的战场毫无疑问是智能体。以办公赛道为代表,大厂们卷得厉害。不过,办公只是水面之上的冰川,更重要的趋势藏在水面之下:全球大厂正不约而同从“做智能体工具”转向“做智能体基础设施”。

今年9月,Google把Vertex AI更名为“Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform”(Gemini企业级智能体平台),服务于企业内部开发、部署、治理和监控AI智能体。随后微软推出Microsoft Agent Factory,结合Copilot Studio与Foundry,支持企业创建复杂的“多智能体”并在同一业务流程中自主协作。

9月16日,百度智能云在其与《人民日报》联合举办的2026智能经济论坛上更进一步,提出基于三类智能体与全栈AI能力打造产业智能体操作系统。同时发布百度搭子生态开发平台,提供智能体全生命周期API,覆盖开发、运行到管理全流程,帮助企业在现有系统中集成,快速定制产业智能体,最终建立起互惠互利的开放智能体生态。

从适用于不同场景的智能体到可助力企业完成智能化的整套操作系统。三家科技巨头同时将重心转向智能体基础设施,这绝非简单的巧合,背后有同一个底层逻辑在驱动。

01 智能体大战进入下半场,百度智能云亮出“操作系统”

为什么大家不约而同做这件事?共同的底层逻辑有两个,一是AI技术演进的自然规律,二是企业客户的真实需求。

2023、2024年,AI战场在模型层。所有人拼参数和基准测试,拼谁的模型更聪明。截至目前,头部模型能力已基本趋同,卷不出本质差异了。

2025年,战场到了应用层。智能体爆发,AI办公、AI编程密集落地。但很快遇到天花板:单个智能体能完成的任务有限,跨系统、跨流程的复杂任务做不了。

2026年,当模型层和应用层都难以拉开差距,竞争焦点落到了更底层:谁能管好智能体?谁能控住成本?谁能保证安全和合规?这些问题的答案,不在模型或者应用里,只能是在基础设施里。

其实,基础设施的竞争一直都在,但不如模型层和应用层那么引人瞩目。现在前两者卷不动了,战场自然下沉:谁先把基础设施做透,谁就拿到竞争下半场的入场券。

再看企业客户的需求。这是驱动大厂做选择的真正动力。过去两年,大量企业试水了AI。员工用AI写周报、做PPT、查数据,效率确实提升了。但真到规模化部署的时候,痛点全出来了。

假如企业内部一个部门用5个智能体,自然是没问题。但当5个部门同时部署50个智能体,麻烦就出现了,谁来授权管理?每个智能体能访问什么数据?出了问题怎么追溯?企业发现,根本管不住这些散落的智能体。

而且,许多企业有数年、数十年沉淀的ERP、CRM、知识库等信息化建设资产,但没有与各类智能体打通,后者只能像一层膏药贴在企业信息系统上面,无法深度理解核心业务。这还牵涉一笔经济账:信息化建设已经投入不少资金,如今各种零散的AI工具,到底该给谁花钱,投入产出比很难算清。

更重要的是,合规和安全也面临风险。尤其是央国企,数据安全和国产化是硬约束。满足不了合规要求的AI工具,再好用也进不了门。

这些痛点叠加到一起,催生企业客户真正的需求:有没有一个东西,能把这些散落的智能体管起来,能跟已有的信息系统打通,能清楚地看到每个智能体在干什么,能合规、可控成本地规模化部署?

面对技术演进规律和企业客户痛点的交织,百度智能云提出“产业智能体操作系统”的理念,其能将智能体、企业经营体系和云资源组织在一起,让智能体真正跑在企业业务里,推动AI从技术变成经济力量。

02 智能体的天花板,远不在办公桌上

大多数人看到智能体,想到的是办公桌上的事:帮忙写周报、做PPT、查数据。这没错,但远不是智能体的天花板。

过去一年,全球AI资本开支约五千亿美元,仅占全球GDP的0.4%。而同周期内,电力消费加上电力系统投资已接近全球GDP的5%。沈抖表示,AI还未系统地进入真正的基础设施周期。

他认为,产业智能体有机会拉近模型能力与经济增长这两条曲线,把模型能力的进步转化成企业经营成果,让大模型从一项技术变成真正的经济力量。

当智能体深度嵌入企业,会发生几个层面的变化。

第一层,知识。企业最大的隐性资产是员工经验,但这很容易被员工离职而带走。当工作流程、判断标准、行业know-how被编码进智能体,经验将能够持续迭代。

第二层,决策。企业决策慢,通常是因为跨部门数据拉通、汇总需要时间。当智能体能同时调用内外部数据,原来一周的数据分析,可能被压缩到分钟级。

第三层,竞争壁垒。过去企业拼的是“我有多少人才”,未来拼的是“智能体生态有多深”。智能体越用越强,越跑越准。竞争壁垒从“人才数量”变成“智能体生态质量”。

这些变化没有一件发生在办公桌上。它们发生在企业的核心业务流程里,发生在知识沉淀和决策机制里。这才是产业智能体真正的天花板。

而这些变化的前提是,智能体不能是孤立工具。它需要一个能统筹管理企业数据、知识和流程的底座,让不同智能体共享同一个知识体系,统一调度资源。

百度智能云的产业智能体操作系统正是为这个设计的。拆开来看,它的核心是将三类智能体有机融合:通用智能体百度搭子,负责日常运营类任务;专业智能体矩阵包括自我演化智能体伐谋、数据本体智能体胜算、应用开发智能体秒哒、代码智能体文心快码、视觉智能体一见、营销智能体Hogee、数字人智能体一镜等,覆盖有共性的专业场景,占比约30%。

企业定制智能体,覆盖企业自有专有流程,占比约50%,也是最有价值的部分。百度智能云此次发布了百度搭子生态开发平台,覆盖智能体配置、工具配置、上线运行到持续管理的全生命周期,并承诺生态永久不抽佣。“不抽佣”这个策略,恰恰是操作系统精髓的反映。它不同于平台,平台从交易中抽成,而操作系统从基础设施用量中获益。agent跑得越多,底层算力和云资源需求越大,操作系统功能越强大,百度智能云和客户就越受益。

三类智能体的融合符合沈抖在论坛上的判断,他认为,产业智能体有机会把模型能力进步转化成企业经营成果,“让大模型从一项技术变成真正的经济力量”;企业任务里20%是日常运营、30%是专业领域、50%是核心经营任务,未来都会被对应的产业智能体内化。他判断,到2030年将有30亿个产业智能体持续运行,带来超过100吉瓦级推理需求。

关键是,这三类不是烟囱式各自建设,而是共享同一套知识底座,统一调度。这套底座还能够做到“利旧”。企业曾经出钱出力建设的ERP、CRM、知识库等不需要推翻,通过产业智能体操作系统可以skill或MCP的方式轻量接入,被agent调用而非被替代。这极大地降低了企业客户的心理门槛:接入这套操作系统,不需要跃进式重建,是渐进式激活。操作系统没有替代旧系统,而是让旧系统被新的智能体重新激发。

03 全栈自研加国产算力,百度智能云的操作系统已经跑通

基础设施的方向对了,三类智能体有机融合的框架有了,对于百度智能云来说,还有一个疑问:这套操作系统能不能跑起来?毕竟,智能体操作系统对底层的要求远超传统云服务。

Agent Runtime需要高并发沙盒支持大规模agent同时运行,Agent Identity需要权限治理确保每个agent的行为可追溯,Agent Observability需要全链路监控让每一步都有迹可循。这些恰好是Google和微软在重点投入的方向。

但百度智能云具备两者都没有的结构性优势:从芯片到应用的全栈自研,且全栈国产。对智能体操作系统来说,缺一不可。

昆仑芯已经为互联网、能源、金融、制造、汽车、运营商、教育等多个行业建设了全国产昆仑芯集群。天池超节点已实现全栈国产,计算、存储、互联、供电、散热、整柜制造等六大模块全国产,并已在全国多地智算中心实现千柜级部署;百度智能云还开放了架构、供电、散热、节点、互联、管理六大核心模块技术规范。

在AIDC层面,百度智能云提供标准化预制模块,建设周期缩短30%以上,全链路供电效率达到98.5%以上,年均PUE低至1.08。算力建设的瓶颈从“等芯片”变成了“快速建好机房让芯片就位”,整体交付速度大幅提升。

此外,Agent Cloud层面提供极致弹性、极致安全、极致透明的运行环境。高并发沙盒支持大规模智能体启动,全链路可观测让每一步可追溯,企业数据安全和智能体行为安全都有保障。

Google的算力底座是TPU加英伟达,微软几乎完全依赖英伟达。百度智能云的底座则是一整套国产自研体系。对央国企客户而言,“全栈国产”已经从加分项变成了准入门槛。

全栈自研的优势已经开始转化为经营业绩。今年上半年,百度智能云AI云基础设施收入同比增长50%,GPU云增长283%。这个增速的底层逻辑在于:当智能体从“试用”走向“生产”,推理需求的密集程度远超训练。训练是一次性的,运行是持续的。50%的增长说明,需求正在从“训练推理算力”换挡到“智能体全栈运行时”。

沈抖判断,产业智能体将达到数十亿级,推理需求将进入百吉瓦级。这意味着智能体基础设施的需求才刚刚开始。百度Q2财报里AI业务50%的增速,只是刚站上起跑线。

市场也验证了这套操作系统正在跑通:80%央企和超800金融机构选择百度智能云,覆盖了100%系统重要性银行,服务100%中国主流车企,跻身中国具身智能AI云份额第一。这些数字说明,这套智能体操作系统已经跑在企业核心业务里。

04 结语

2026年,AI行业的新共识正在形成:智能体的竞争,不在模型层,也不在应用层,在基础设施层。

智能体竞争的下半场,不是谁的模型更强,而是谁的智能体跑得更稳、跑得更深、跑进企业核心业务里。百度智能云的这套智能体操作系统已经先行一步,加上全栈自研的保障,未来只会越来越快。

注:文/林岩,文章来源:子弹财经,本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

【版权提示】亿邦动力倡导尊重与保护知识产权。未经许可,任何人不得复制、转载、或以其他方式使用本网站的内容。如发现本站文章存在版权问题,烦请提供版权疑问、身份证明、版权证明、联系方式等发邮件至run@ebrun.com,我们将及时沟通与处理。

已点赞

+1

{{ praise_text }}

好文章,值得被更多人看到

FAQ回顾

企业规模化部署AI智能体会遇到哪些共性痛点?

企业规模化部署AI智能体时通常面临四类痛点:一是多部门分散的智能体缺乏统一授权管理,操作行为难追溯;二是无法和企业已建成的ERP、CRM、知识库等信息化资产深度打通,难以融入核心业务;三是零散AI工具投入产出比难以核算;四是数据安全、合规性难以满足要求,央国企的国产化、安全准入门槛更高。

2026年AI智能体行业的竞争焦点发生了什么变化?

2026年AI智能体行业竞争焦点已从模型层、应用层下沉至基础设施层。当前头部大模型能力已基本趋同,单智能体完成跨系统复杂任务的能力存在天花板,支撑智能体统一管理、成本可控、安全合规运行的基础设施,成为行业竞争下半场的核心入场券。

百度智能云产业智能体操作系统的核心架构是什么?

百度智能云产业智能体操作系统核心是三类智能体的有机融合:占比20%的通用智能体百度搭子负责日常运营类任务;占比30%的专业智能体矩阵覆盖营销、开发、数据等共性专业场景;占比50%的企业定制智能体适配企业自有专有流程,三类智能体共享统一知识底座,支持企业原有信息系统轻量接入。

百度智能云的智能体基础设施有什么差异化优势?

百度智能云智能体基础设施的核心差异化优势是实现从芯片到应用的全栈自研、全栈国产化:搭载自研昆仑芯,天池超节点六大模块实现全国产,已落地千柜级部署;AIDC建设周期缩短30%以上,全链路供电效率达98.5%,年均PUE低至1.08,可满足央国企的安全合规准入要求。

广告

下一篇

2021亿邦产业互联网大会

12月16-17日,在北京,让中小企业“不会转、不能转、不敢转”的数字化难题,被产业互联网3+1范式实效化解。

点我报名

降价至6?8元 被罗永浩怀念的钟薛高能重拾信任吗?

9月16日,在第28届中国冰淇淋及冷冻食品产业博览会上,钟雪高品牌管理(上海)有限公司携“钟薛高”品牌重新亮相。

未来零售 新消费 零食 钟薛高

2026-09-18 09:34:04