• 亿邦公众号
    • APP下载

小云雀vs万镜一刻 聊聊字节与阿里的内容Agent一番战

作者:壹叔团队 文章来源:壹娱观察

2026-06-15 12:47

作者:壹叔团队 文章来源:壹娱观察

2026-06-15 12:47

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心介绍了字节跳动和阿里最新推出的两款内容创作AI Agent产品的竞争现状,以及行业整体情况,核心干货如下

1. 两款产品的基础使用信息:字节剪映孵化的小云雀目前已在网页和App上线,基本免费使用,每日登录送120积分,支持一句话生成15-60秒成片,可复刻抖音、小红书热门视频的风格,还能直接上传剧本生成短剧漫剧成片,不过目前存在精细控制不足、高峰期排队最长达8小时等问题。

2. 阿里发布的万镜一刻全链路AI视频创作平台已经于5月21日面向全行业开放,支持上传剧本自动解析生成分镜,可复用角色素材避免跨镜头风格漂移,支持企业将其集成进自有工作流,适配企业规模化内容生产需求。

本文能为品牌商了解AI内容营销工具、把握内容赛道趋势提供参考,核心干货如下

1. 消费与赛道趋势:当前内容赛道已经出现需求见顶、供给过剩的情况,国内移动互联网用户时长和规模早已停止增长,短剧赛道月活已接近网民上限,增长陷入停滞,题材监管趋严,题材红利接近耗尽,品牌布局内容营销要警惕赛道内卷风险。

2. 可利用的工具资源:当前两款AI Agent都能满足品牌营销内容量产需求,中小品牌可免费使用字节小云雀生产种草短内容,品牌企业可接入阿里万镜一刻的定制化能力,生产规模化营销内容,已有A.O.史密斯用该工具制作销售数字分身内容,模式可参考。

3. 成本提示:AI仅能降低内容制作成本,降本节省的资金大多会转为投流预算,品牌需要提前做好投放成本规划。

本文能为做内容生意的卖家梳理AI内容Agent赛道的机会与风险,核心干货如下

1. 行业现状与风险:当前内容AI Agent赛道玩家众多,功能高度同质化,已经陷入内卷;需求端用户注意力总量固定,短剧赛道增长停滞,题材监管趋严,效率提升无法带来增量市场,全行业成本下降会引发价格下行,每条内容分到的收益会缩水,降本省下的资金大多会转为投流成本,新入场卖家需要警惕风险。

2. 对应机会:不同规模卖家可以选择适配的工具,中小卖家可免费使用小云雀降低内容制作成本,企业型卖家可接入万镜一刻的API和资产复用能力,做规模化内容生产,短剧出海等方向已经有成熟客户案例,可以参考布局。

本文能为内容生产类工厂提供AI转型的方向和商业机会参考,核心干货如下

1. 产品生产需求变化:当前内容行业对规模化、批量化生产的需求提升,AI Agent可以大幅降低内容制作成本,解决传统生产效率低的问题,万镜一刻推出的素材资产复用功能,刚好解决了跨镜头风格漂移、素材重复制作的行业痛点,能有效降低生产中的试错成本。

2. 商业机会与转型启示:AI内容产能扩张的背景下,完成数字化升级的内容工厂可以对接大厂工具,承接规模化内容制作订单,短剧出海赛道已经有成熟的合作案例可参考;但需要注意赛道整体已经内卷,需求没有增量,不要盲目扩张产能,避免陷入低价竞争。

本文能为AI内容相关服务商梳理行业趋势、客户痛点和差异化方向,核心干货如下

1. 行业发展趋势:国内大模型竞争已经上移到内容Agent赛道,几乎所有拥有视频模型的大厂都完成布局,赛道拥挤,功能同质化严重,需求端用户注意力已经见顶,赛道整体陷入内卷,只有拥有生产分发闭环的玩家能获得长期收益,纯工具层可获取的收益空间非常有限。

2. 客户痛点与解决方案参考:当前B端客户的核心痛点是批量生产时风格不稳定、素材复用率低、缺乏适配工业化生产的工作流,服务商可以参考万镜一刻的差异化思路,主打生产流程优化和数字资产管理,开放API支持客户集成进自有工作流,满足企业客户的定制化需求,建立差异化竞争力。

本文能为布局内容赛道的平台商梳理行业需求、可参考路径和需要规避的风险,核心干货如下

1. 核心需求:当前市场对AI内容Agent的核心需求是降低内容制作成本、提升规模化产能,市场并不缺少内容,缺的是能获取用户注意力的优质内容,平台布局需要围绕盘活注意力而非单纯扩产能设计。

2. 可参考的成功路径:字节的闭环模式已经得到验证,通过免费工具吸引用户生产内容,产出的内容回流自有内容分发体系,靠流量变现覆盖算力成本,适合拥有内容分发能力的平台参考。

3. 风险规避:如果平台没有完成生产-分发-变现的闭环,盲目布局会空耗算力,仅能赚取少量工具费用,相当于为其他平台的内容池做供给,投入产出比极低;当前赛道供给已经过剩,需求增长停滞,新入场平台不要盲目跟风布局。

本文为AI内容产业研究者提供了内容Agent赛道最新的产业动向、核心问题和商业模式分析,核心干货如下

1. 产业新动向:国内大模型的百模大战后,竞争已经上移到应用层的Agent领域,字节和阿里作为头部玩家,分别推出了面向内容创作的小云雀和万镜一刻,当前全行业头部玩家基本都完成布局,赛道拥挤,功能同质化严重,竞争十分激烈。

2. 核心产业问题:当前行业仅解决了供给侧降本提效的问题,需求侧用户注意力已经见顶,内容赛道增长陷入停滞,供给快速膨胀引发全行业内卷,整体新增价值极低,大部分没有闭环的玩家的投入都属于空耗算力,是不敢缺席的布局而非有效布局。

3. 商业模式总结:当前头部玩家有两种主流模式,分别是字节的生态入口模式,免费工具为集团内容生态提供供给,支撑整体流量变现;阿里的企业服务模式,靠工具、API、授权赚钱,服务集团云业务,两种模式中Agent本身都不独立盈利,都是服务集团整体生态的获客入口。

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article analyzes the current competitive landscape of the two latest AI content creation agents launched by ByteDance and Alibaba, as well as the overall status of the industry. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Basic information on the two products: ByteDance's Xia Yunque, incubated by its video-editing app CapCut, is now available on the web and mobile app. The product is mostly free to use, offering 120 daily points upon login. It supports generating 15 to 60-second finished videos from a single text prompt, can replicate the style of viral videos on Douyin and Xiaohongshu, and even generates finished short dramas and motion comics directly from uploaded scripts. It still has shortcomings, however, including limited fine-grained control and wait times as long as 8 hours during peak usage.

2. Alibaba's Wanjing Yike, an end-to-end AI video creation platform, opened to the entire industry on May 21. It supports automatically parsing uploaded scripts to generate storyboards, reuses character assets to avoid cross-shot style drift, and allows enterprises to integrate the platform into their in-house workflows to meet large-scale content production needs.

This article helps brand owners understand AI-powered content marketing tools and spot trends in the content space. Key insights are as follows:

1. Sector trends: Demand for generic content has peaked and supply is already oversaturated. The total size and user time spent on China's mobile internet have stopped growing for years, and the monthly active user base of the short drama segment is already close to the total number of Chinese internet users, leaving almost no room for further growth. Meanwhile, regulatory scrutiny over content topics is tightening, and the dividend from niche题材 has nearly run out. Brands need to watch out for intensified competition when planning content marketing layouts.

2. Available tools for brands: Both new AI agents can meet brands' needs for mass production of marketing content. Small and medium-sized brands can use ByteDance's Xia Yunque for free to create short endorsement content for products, while larger brand owners can access Alibaba's Wanjing Yike for customized capabilities to produce marketing content at scale. A.O. Smith has already used the tool to create digital salesperson content, offering a replicable model for other brands.

3. Cost note: AI only cuts content production costs, and most of the savings are shifted to ad spend budgets. Brands need to plan for投放 costs in advance.

This article helps sellers operating content-focused businesses sort out opportunities and risks in the AI content agent track. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry status and risks: The AI content agent track is crowded with many players offering highly homogeneous features, and competition has already become cutthroat. On the demand side, total user attention is fixed, short drama growth is stagnant, and regulatory scrutiny is intensifying. Efficiency gains do not create new incremental market demand, and industry-wide cost cuts will drive down prices, shrinking per-content revenue. Most cost savings are also redirected to ad spending, so new entrants need to be cautious of risks.

2. Opportunities for sellers: Sellers of different scales can choose tools that fit their needs. Small and medium-sized sellers can use Xia Yunque for free to cut content production costs, while enterprise-level sellers can integrate Wanjing Yike via its open API and leverage its asset reuse capabilities for large-scale content production. There are already mature client cases in directions such as cross-border short drama that sellers can reference for their own布局.

This article offers reference for AI transformation directions and business opportunities for content production factories. Key insights are as follows:

1. Shifts in production demand: The content industry now sees rising demand for large-scale, mass production. AI agents can drastically cut content production costs and solve the low efficiency problem of traditional production. Wanjing Yike's asset reuse feature directly addresses common industry pain points of cross-shot style drift and redundant素材 production, effectively cutting trial-and-error costs in production.

2. Business opportunities and transformation insights: Against the background of expanding AI content production capacity, digitally upgraded content factories can partner with major tech firms' tools to take on large-scale content production orders, with mature cooperation cases already available in the cross-border short drama track. However, players need to note that the overall track is already oversaturated with no incremental demand, so they should avoid blindly expanding capacity and getting trapped in cut-throat price competition.

This article helps AI content-related service providers sort out industry trends, client pain points and differentiation strategies. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry development trends: Competition between China's large language models has moved upstream to the content agent track. Nearly all major tech firms with video models have entered the space, making the track crowded with highly homogeneous products and severe competition. On the demand side, user attention has already peaked, leaving the overall track stuck in cut-throat内卷. Only players with a closed production-and-distribution loop can generate long-term returns, while pure tool players face very limited profit margins.

2. Client pain points and solution references: The core pain point for B-end clients today is unstable style in mass production, low素材 reuse rates, and the lack of workflows adapted for industrialized production. Service providers can reference Wanjing Yike's differentiation strategy, focusing on production workflow optimization and digital asset management, opening APIs to allow clients to integrate the tool into their own workflows, meeting customized demands from enterprise clients to build differentiated competitive advantages.

This article helps platforms布局 the content track sort out industry demand, viable paths and risks to avoid. Key insights are as follows:

1. Core market demand: The core demand for AI content agents today is cutting content production costs and increasing large-scale production capacity. The market does not lack content—it lacks high-quality content that can capture user attention. Platforms should design their布局 around activating user attention, not just expanding production capacity.

2. Proven viable paths: ByteDance's closed-loop model has already been validated: it attracts users to create content via free tools, and the generated content feeds back into its in-house content distribution system, where ad revenue covers computing costs. This model is a strong reference for platforms that already have content distribution capabilities.

3. Risk mitigation: For platforms without a complete production-distribution-monetization closed loop, blind entry will only waste computing power, generate only minimal tool revenue, and essentially supply content to other platforms' content libraries, resulting in an extremely low return on investment. With the track already oversupplied and demand growth stagnant, new platforms should not enter the space blindly following trends.

This article offers AI content industry researchers the latest industry developments, core issues and business model analysis of the content agent track. Key findings are as follows:

1. New industry developments: After the "hundred-model war" of China's large model race, competition has shifted upstream to the application layer's agent segment. As two leading players, ByteDance and Alibaba have respectively launched Xia Yunque and Wanjing Yike for content creation. Almost all leading industry players have completed their布局, making the track crowded with highly homogeneous products and fierce competition.

2. Core industry issues: The industry has only solved supply-side cost reduction and efficiency improvement to date. On the demand side, user attention has already peaked, and content track growth has stagnated. Rapidly expanding supply has intensified industry-wide competition, generating very little new overall value. Most players without a closed loop are just wasting computing power—their布局 is more about not missing out on the trend than building a viable business.

3. Business model summary: Two main business models have emerged among leading players: ByteDance's ecosystem entry model, where free tools supply content for the group's overall content ecosystem to support overall traffic monetization; and Alibaba's enterprise service model, which generates revenue from tools, APIs and licensing to support the group's cloud business. In both models, the agent itself does not turn a profit independently, and instead acts as a customer acquisition channel that serves the group's overall ecosystem.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

文/HAL

国内大模型的“百模大战”还没分出胜负,竞争已经上移到了agent这一层。

5月21日的阿里云峰会上,阿里发布全链路AI视频创作平台万镜一刻,英文名WonderClip,当天面向全行业开放。

不过字节这边动作更早,剪映团队孵化的小云雀agent此前已在网页和App双端运行,今年2月Seedance 2.0发布后用户量随之上涨,3月中旬又推出了行业第一个搭载Seedance 2.0的短剧漫剧Agent,剧本上传后直接产出视频成片。面对竞争,不久前又快速迭代了2.0版本。

当然,由于彼此对接和擅长的生态不同,小云雀与万镜一刻在内容流量与电商营销方面都有各自的着重点,但两款产品都作为内容创作agent,都承诺从想法到成片一次完成,面向的也是短剧、营销、网文改编这同一批生意,被摆在一起当成字节和阿里的又一次正面交锋,顺理成章。

不过,对于当下来说,市场或许并不缺少工具甚至是内容,海量内容制造出来之后,谁去消费反而成了一个现实问题,而这恰恰是AI解决不了的部分。

01

二者对垒,殊途同归

背靠完善内容生态的小云雀先发无疑相当明显,根据量子位智库3月公布的数据,其App的DAU超过80万,环比增长54%,下载量环比增长122%。

功能上,输入一句主题可以产出15到60秒的成片,挑一个可商用数字人形象配上文案就能做口播,贴一个抖音或小红书链接进去,它会拆解其中的镜头逻辑、节奏、画风和BGM,输出一条同款。每天登录送120积分,目前基本免费。

而它的模型能力,本质上就是Seedance 2.0的能力。

Seedance 2.0支持最多12个素材的混合输入,图片用来定义角色,旧视频用来定义运镜,音频可以驱动画面节奏,再加上物理规律建模和原生的音画同步,这些构成了小云雀做短剧Agent的全部底气。

当然模型的短板也原样传导到产品上,根据不少用户的实测反馈显示,对于镜头级的精细控制做不到,时长和分辨率有上限,跨片段的风格不一致,复杂叙事撑不起来,高峰期排队最长到过八个小时。

更关键的事实是,豆包、即梦、剪映、随变、小云雀,视频生成的底层全是同一个Seedance 2.0,相互之间的区别只在开放的功能、生成速度和额度。

字节并不存在一个叫“小云雀”的独立技术体系,它是同一个模型的众多出口之一,分到的任务是短剧和漫剧这个垂直场景。

免费策略换来内容供给,产出的视频回流字节的分发体系,小云雀自己赚不赚钱,在这个结构里本来就不是一个需要回答的问题。

而阿里云基于Happy Horse打造的万镜一刻则明显思路不同,它把重心放在了流程上。

平台分五个模块:剧本智能解析、故事板生成、主体创作、在线剪辑、资产管理。

剧本上传后自动解析结构,生成分镜脚本和运镜指令,自动分配镜头、场景和角色,拆解长篇小说的智能解析模式即将上线。工作流有三种形态:故事板、无限画布,以及内置编剧、导演、提示词工程师等多个Agent协同的对话式成片模式,最后这个还在灰度测试。

底层是阿里自家的一排模型,万相Wan2.7打底,Happy Horse负责视频生成,Qwen-image和Z-image负责图像与渲染。单论模型能力,这套组合面对Seedance 2.0未必占优,HappyHorse此前在跑分上赢过,但在带音频的赛道差距很小,多素材联合输入的能力也还没有跟上。

它真正的差异点或许在于所谓的“主体创作”。角色、场景、道具可以先单独建出多视角主图,存成项目的视觉档案,之后所有镜头调用同一套素材,跨镜头不换脸、风格不漂移。一次性生成的素材由此变成可以反复调用的资产。

这个设计对于短剧团队当然用处不小,毕竟素材或资产复用也能节约不少抽卡成本。但或许其底层服务对象更多还是电商团队,就目前给出的客户名单似乎也对应了这个观察。

已公布的客户包括做短剧出海的小五兄弟、给销售做数字分身的A.O.史密斯、做规模化内容量产的钛动科技。

至于商业化,万镜一刻配了独立域名和UI的品牌专属空间、全栈API集成、多工作室模式和权限隔离,对已有Agent架构的企业开放音视频创作的Skills和API,支持“被集成”进对方的工作流,交付走工具平台、API、品牌套件三条线,外加一层授权服务商。

把两边放在一起看就会清楚,这场对垒似乎并不是单纯的产品或模型能力比拼。

小云雀更像是字节Seedance的又一个入口,靠免费给抖音换内容供给;万镜一刻是阿里云的一个延伸,赌企业愿意为流程和资产管理付钱。一个服务字节的内容生态,一个服务阿里的云业务,两款产品更多起到还是为集团获得token的任务。

02

除了字节

影视agent都是吃力不讨好

真正值得讨论的问题,在两款产品之外。

腾讯有上头蛙,字节除了小云雀还有即梦的“小章鱼”,快手有可灵,几乎每一家手里有视频模型的公司都配了agent,功能高度重合:一句话成片、故事板、数字人、全链路。去年是百模大战,今年这一层的拥挤程度不遑多让。

而所有这些agent能改变的,都只有供给侧。

关键是需求端的数字见顶已久,国内移动互联网的用户规模和人均时长,过去两年基本没有增长;短剧行业月活7.18亿,离网民总数的上限已经很近。

用户的注意力总量是固定的,看了这条就看不了那条。即便是野蛮生长的短剧,过去半年也明显陷入了增长停滞。

供给端则在膨胀。

DataEye的数据,今年1月AI漫剧单月上线14634部,日均超过470部;3月,仅红果一个平台的漫剧日均上新就达到2000部,相当于真人剧的20倍。这还是agent大规模铺开之前的产能。

然而最近又有大量关于短剧题材禁令的消息传出,对于短剧而言,题材红利显然也快消耗殆尽。

在一个需求停止增长的市场里,效率提升换不来增量。单条视频的成本确实降了,但所有人的成本同时在降,竞争的结果只是价格下行、产量上行,每条内容分到的注意力和回报同步缩水。降本省下来的钱也很难留住,多数会变成投流预算,交还给平台。

内卷这个词的原义说的就是这种状态:投入持续增加,总产出不再增长。

所以,这一轮agent竞赛,从一开始就缺少出口。它消耗真实的算力,产出大量无人看完的视频,新增的价值接近于零。

真正得益的是两头,模型层和分发层——

小云雀不靠自己赚钱,它的任务是给抖音补充内容供给;万镜一刻收费,但收入实质上归于阿里云的算力和模型。agent这一层自身能留下的东西很少,与其说是产品,它更接近大厂各自生态的一个入口。

沿着这个结构再往下推一步,结论会更难听:就目前的生态而言,除了字节,其他家做影视内容agent都是吃力不讨好,纯属浪费算力。

字节是唯一闭环的玩家。

模型是自己的Seedance,工具是小云雀和即梦、剪映,分发是抖音和红果甚至TikTok,变现靠广告和免费阅读式的流量生意。内容从生产到消费不出自家体系,agent烧掉的算力至少换来了供给,这笔账还能算。

其他家不具备这个“闭环”条件。

阿里没有自己的内容消费场,万镜一刻帮客户量产出来的短剧,最后大半还是要投放到红果和抖音上去,等于烧着阿里云的算力,替字节的内容池扩充供给,自己赚一点工具和API的钱,分发环节的大头一分拿不到。

快手手里有分发,但可灵的收入七成来自海外的个人订阅,国内从生产到分发的闭环并没有真正转起来;腾讯的上头蛙面对的也是同一道题……

在算力本就紧张的当下,这些投入与其说是布局,不如说是不敢缺席。

这不等于说agent没有价值,降低创作门槛是事实,万镜一刻的资产化思路也确实对着短剧工业化的真实痛点。

但有价值和值得每家大厂都做一个,是两回事。这个判断适用于之前的视频大模型,当下原样适用于agent。

小云雀和万镜一刻的胜负,字节和阿里自然在意。只是放在一个需求不再增长的市场里,这场争霸战打得再热闹,空耗依然是空耗,产生不了什么真正的价值。

注:文/壹叔团队,文章来源:壹娱观察(公众号ID:yiyuguancha),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

【版权提示】亿邦动力倡导尊重与保护知识产权。未经许可,任何人不得复制、转载、或以其他方式使用本网站的内容。如发现本站文章存在版权问题,烦请提供版权疑问、身份证明、版权证明、联系方式等发邮件至run@ebrun.com,我们将及时沟通与处理。

已点赞

+1

{{ praise_text }}

好文章,值得被更多人看到

广告

下一篇

跨境电商资源对接

《全球跨境电商服务商资源手册》第二期手册现已发布,触达更多资源,了解跨境服务商信息,欢迎点击链接下载。

了解详情

AI 能帮忙买基金?蚂蚁集团秘密测试 AI 支付宝

据彭博社消息,蚂蚁集团正秘密测试 AI 版支付宝,新版本将颠覆原有用户交互,可一键切入原生AI界面,实现服务的智能化。

服务商 阿里巴巴 支付 支付宝

2026-06-15 10:43:54