• 亿邦公众号
    • APP下载

从一家深圳小厂逆袭成移动充电巨头 倍思能否跳出3C配件圈内卷?

作者:冯羽 文章来源:创业最前线

2026-11-11 09:05

作者:冯羽 文章来源:创业最前线

2026-11-11 09:05

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

总:倍思从深圳小厂做成全球充电头部,靠快充爆品和全渠道铺量。

1.起步:创始人何世友从二手手机起步,2011年在深圳龙岗创立Baseus,2019年65W多口氮化镓充电器走红;2021年充电器出货9000万件,年售产品超1亿件。

2.出海:提前在三十多国注册商标,先东南亚、中东、东欧再欧美,进入180多国,海外销售约四成,用户超3亿。

总:扩品带来增长,也暴露短板。

1.品类:覆盖十多品类上千SKU,耳机、户外电源、摄像头等;2025年第三季度开放式耳机全球出货同比增长约560%。

2.风险:发明专利仅占6.87%,依赖场景微创新和代工;2025年约38个SKU的3C认证被暂停,召回约3.88万台,品控和信任受考验。

3.启示:先抓风口铺渠道,再补合规、供应链和技术壁垒,否则会夹在原厂与白牌之间。

总:倍思的品牌打法是“Base on user”加好看不贵,以快充爆品建立认知,再用多品类和全渠道放大规模。

1.产品与研发:2019年65W多口氮化镓充电器踩中手机功率上行和原装头笨重痛点;后续做伸缩线、数显、多口合并等场景微创新,并扩展到耳机、户外电源、摄像头。

2.渠道:国内天猫、京东、抖音并进,抖音旗舰店粉丝超225万;海外亚马逊、速卖通、Lazada、Shopee、TikTok及独立站,进入百思买、沃尔玛,覆盖180多国。

3.定价:天猫充电宝相比安克、绿联、图拉斯有价格优势,抖音爆款多为百元级,天猫基础款不超百元。

总:品牌风险在价格心智和技术壁垒。

1.发明专利仅6.87%,新品易被模仿,难卖溢价;扩品分散研发和供应链议价权。

2.2025年安全危机中约38个SKU认证暂停、召回约3.88万台,消费者投诉影响信任。

3.消费趋势上,若用户把技术排在外观和价格前,品牌需用新国标、头部电芯和可信品质重建溢价。

总:文章给卖家的核心信号是合规洗牌带来机会,但低价扩品也有风险。

1.政策与事件:2025年充电宝安全风暴中,倍思约38个SKU的3C认证被暂停,并召回约3.88万台;它随后以新国标参编单位身份推合规产品,并把核心电芯供应商切换为亿纬锂能、力神。

2.市场机会:海外覆盖180多国、销售约四成;开放式耳机2025年第三季度全球出货同比增长约560%;便携储能、车载周边等是新品类机会。

3.可学习点:国内天猫、京东、抖音加海外亚马逊、速卖通、Lazada、Shopee、TikTok和独立站的全渠道打法;从FOB供货转向美国、日本、印尼子公司本地化经营。

总:风险提示。

1.部分产品依赖第三方代工,品控不一致会引发售后和投诉。

2.夹在手机原厂与低价白牌之间,单纯性价比难持续。

3.文中未提平台扶持政策,卖家应优先抓合规认证、供应链透明和品牌信任。

总:倍思的工厂端信息集中在代工、设计需求和新国标供应链。

1.生产模式:大部分充电产品自主生产,少部分充电产品及耳机、数据线委托第三方;PicoGo超充Pro三合一伸缩线移动电源由湖南炬神电子生产,PicoGo卡片磁吸Air由深圳今翔科技生产,两家均与倍思无股权关系。

2.设计需求:长项是场景化微创新和外观设计,如伸缩线、数显、多口合并;专利结构以实用新型56.12%和外观设计37.01%为主,发明专利仅6.87%。

3.商业机会:新国标移动电源带来合规生产需求,核心电芯转向亿纬锂能、力神等头部厂;开放式耳机全球出货增长约560%,600W户外储能由院士团队联合研发,显示新品类代工和联合研发机会。

总:电商启示。

1.代工品控直接影响品牌信任,工厂需配合认证、追溯和稳定质量。

2.品牌全渠道放量会带来小单快反和爆款生产需求,但也要求工厂跟上合规与成本控制。

总:服务商可从倍思案例看到移动充电行业的三类机会:合规、供应链和品牌升级。

1.行业趋势:2025年全球移动充电市场规模2441亿元,倍思以2.3%份额排第三,次于安克4.8%和苹果4.6%;安全风暴后杂牌清退,份额向有认证品牌集中。

2.客户痛点:倍思约38个SKU的3C认证被暂停、召回约3.88万台;部分产品由湖南炬神、深圳今翔等第三方工厂生产,品控良莠不齐;发明专利仅6.87%,新品易被模仿,难溢价。

3.解决方案:协助做新国标合规和认证管理,建立代工厂审核与质量追溯,优化电芯等核心供应商,帮助品牌从低价走量转向技术壁垒和可信认知。

总:新技术与新品类。

1.氮化镓快充、磁吸充电宝、开放式耳机、便携储能是可见方向。

2.服务商可围绕全渠道运营、跨境本地化和售后投诉治理提供方案。

总:倍思是多平台放量的典型,平台既能获得爆品供给,也要承担合规风险。

1.平台需求:需要能走量的品牌和爆款。倍思2026年双11天猫自带双线充电宝已售60万+,挂耳式耳机占第二、第三;2025年双11天猫移动电源成交登顶、京东总榜前三;抖音旗舰店粉丝超225万,位列3C数码配件成交榜第一。

2.平台运营:国内天猫、京东、抖音并用,爆款集中在百元级充电和入门耳机;海外亚马逊、速卖通、Lazada、Shopee、TikTok和独立站并进,进入百思买、沃尔玛。

总:招商与风向规避。

1.招商应优先合规、有认证、供应链透明的头部品牌,关注新国标产品和核心电芯供应商。

2.风险在于3C认证暂停、召回和售后投诉,平台需核验制造商与生产厂信息、建立召回监测。

3.文中未展开平台最新扶持做法,但榜单、直播和价格带运营是可见抓手。

总:倍思案例提供三个研究切口:产业集中、商业模式和合规治理。

1.产业格局:2025年全球移动充电市场2441亿元,安克4.8%、苹果4.6%、倍思2.3%;赛道分技术品牌派、全品类扩张派、生态捆绑派和细分品类派,倍思靠场景微创新、低价和全渠道居中间。

2.商业模式:十多品类上千SKU,海外销售约四成、180多国、用户超3亿;但发明专利仅6.87%,实用新型56.12%、外观37.01%,扩品可能摊薄研发并削弱供应链议价权。

3.新问题:2025年安全风暴暴露电芯供应商和代工品控风险,倍思约38个SKU认证暂停、召回约3.88万台;新国标参编和切换亿纬锂能、力神是修补。

总:政策与启示。

1.建议强化认证、供应链追溯和召回机制。

2.企业需从风口铺量转向技术壁垒和品牌信任,回答扩品究竟是第二曲线还是分散兵力。

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

Overall: Baseus grew from a small Shenzhen manufacturer into a top global charging brand by relying on fast-charging hit products and full-channel volume distribution.

1. Origins: Founder He Shiyou started with used phones, founded Baseus in Longgang, Shenzhen, in 2011, and gained traction with its 65W multi-port GaN charger in 2019. In 2021, charger shipments reached 90 million units, with annual product sales exceeding 100 million units.

2. Overseas expansion: It registered trademarks in more than 30 countries ahead of expansion, entering Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe first, then Europe and the US. It now operates in 180+ countries, with overseas sales at about 40% and more than 300 million users.

Overall: Category expansion has driven growth but also exposed weaknesses.

1. Categories: It covers more than ten categories and over 1,000 SKUs, including headphones, outdoor power stations, and cameras. In Q3 2025, global shipments of its open-ear headphones rose about 560% year on year.

2. Risks: Invention patents account for only 6.87%, leaving it dependent on use-case micro-innovation and contract manufacturing. In 2025, about 38 SKUs had their 3C certification suspended and about 38,800 units were recalled, testing quality control and consumer trust.

3. Takeaway: It first seized trends and built channel coverage, but must now shore up compliance, supply chain, and technology barriers; otherwise it will remain squeezed between original-brand manufacturers and white-label players.

Overall: Baseus's brand playbook combines "Base on user" with good-looking and affordable products, using fast-charging hero products to build awareness and then scaling through multi-category and omnichannel distribution.

1. Products and R&D: Its 2019 65W multi-port GaN charger addressed rising phone charging power and bulky stock chargers. It later pursued use-case micro-innovations such as retractable cables, digital displays, and multi-port consolidation, and expanded into headphones, outdoor power stations, and cameras.

2. Channels: Domestically, it runs on Tmall, JD, and Douyin in parallel, with its Douyin flagship store exceeding 2.25 million followers. Overseas, it uses Amazon, AliExpress, Lazada, Shopee, TikTok, and DTC sites, has entered Best Buy and Walmart, and covers 180+ countries.

3. Pricing: On Tmall, its power banks have a price advantage over Anker, UGREEN, and Torras. Douyin hero products are mostly in the RMB100 range, while Tmall base models are under RMB100.

Overall: Brand risks lie in price perception and technology barriers.

1. Invention patents account for only 6.87%; new products are easily copied and hard to sell at a premium. Category expansion also dilutes R&D and supply chain bargaining power.

2. In the 2025 safety crisis, about 38 SKUs had certification suspended and about 38,800 units were recalled; consumer complaints hurt trust.

3. On consumer trends, if users rank technology above design and price, the brand must rebuild its premium with the new national standard, top-tier cells, and credible quality.

Overall: The core signal for sellers is that a compliance-driven reshuffle creates opportunities, but low-price category expansion carries risks.

1. Policy and events: During the 2025 power bank safety storm, about 38 Baseus SKUs had their 3C certification suspended and about 38,800 units were recalled. Baseus then promoted compliant products as a co-drafting participant in the new national standard and switched its core cell suppliers to EVE Energy and Lishen.

2. Market opportunities: It covers 180+ countries, with overseas sales at about 40%. Global shipments of open-ear headphones rose about 560% year on year in Q3 2025, and portable energy storage and car peripherals are new category opportunities.

3. Lessons to learn: Its omnichannel playbook spans Tmall, JD, and Douyin domestically and Amazon, AliExpress, Lazada, Shopee, TikTok, and DTC sites overseas. It is also moving from FOB supply to localized operations through subsidiaries in the US, Japan, and Indonesia.

Overall: Risk notes.

1. Some products rely on third-party contract manufacturing; inconsistent quality control can trigger after-sales issues and complaints.

2. Caught between phone OEMs and low-price white-label players, pure cost-performance is hard to sustain.

3. The article does not mention platform support policies; sellers should prioritize compliance certification, supply chain transparency, and brand trust.

Overall: Factory-side information on Baseus centers on contract manufacturing, design demand, and the new national standard supply chain.

1. Production model: Most charging products are self-produced, while some chargers and headphones and data cables are outsourced. The PicoGo SuperCharge Pro 3-in-1 retractable-cable power bank is produced by Hunan Jushen Electronics, and PicoGo Card Magnetic Air by Shenzhen Jinxiang Technology; neither has an equity relationship with Baseus.

2. Design demand: Its strengths are use-case micro-innovation and industrial design, such as retractable cables, digital displays, and multi-port consolidation. Its patent mix is dominated by utility models at 56.12% and design patents at 37.01%, with invention patents at only 6.87%.

3. Business opportunities: New national standard power banks create compliant production demand, and core cells are shifting to leading suppliers such as EVE Energy and Lishen. Global shipments of open-ear headphones rose about 560%, and its 600W outdoor energy storage product was co-developed with an academician-led team, pointing to OEM and joint R&D opportunities in new categories.

Overall: E-commerce implications.

1. Contract-manufacturing quality directly affects brand trust; factories need to support certification, traceability, and stable quality.

2. A brand's omnichannel volume will create demand for small-batch quick-response and hit-product production, but it also requires factories to keep pace with compliance and cost control.

Overall: Service providers can see three types of opportunities in mobile charging from the Baseus case: compliance, supply chain, and brand upgrade.

1. Industry trend: In 2025, the global mobile charging market was RMB244.1 billion. Baseus ranked third with a 2.3% share, after Anker at 4.8% and Apple at 4.6%. After the safety storm, off-brands exited and share concentrated among certified brands.

2. Customer pain points: About 38 Baseus SKUs had their 3C certification suspended and about 38,800 units were recalled. Some products are made by third-party factories such as Hunan Jushen and Shenzhen Jinxiang, with uneven quality control. Invention patents account for only 6.87%, so new products are easily copied and hard to sell at a premium.

3. Solutions: Assist with new national standard compliance and certification management, establish contract-manufacturer audits and quality traceability, optimize core suppliers such as cell providers, and help brands move from low-price volume to technology barriers and credible perception.

Overall: New technologies and categories.

1. GaN fast charging, magnetic power banks, open-ear headphones, and portable energy storage are visible directions.

2. Service providers can offer solutions around omnichannel operations, cross-border localization, and after-sales complaint management.

Overall: Baseus is a typical case of multi-platform volume growth; platforms gain hit-product supply but also bear compliance risk.

1. Platform demand: Platforms need scalable brands and hit products. During the 2026 Double 11 shopping festival, Baseus's Tmall power bank with built-in dual cables had sold more than 600,000 units, and its ear-hook headphones took second and third places. During the 2025 Double 11, it topped Tmall's mobile power bank GMV and ranked in JD's overall top three. Its Douyin flagship store has more than 2.25 million followers and ranked No. 1 on the 3C digital accessories GMV list.

2. Platform operations: It uses Tmall, JD, and Douyin domestically, with hit products concentrated in RMB100-level charging and entry-level headphones. Overseas, it runs on Amazon, AliExpress, Lazada, Shopee, TikTok, and DTC sites, and has entered Best Buy and Walmart.

Overall: Merchant recruitment and risk avoidance.

1. Merchant recruitment should prioritize leading brands that are compliant, certified, and supply-chain transparent, and should pay attention to new national standard products and core cell suppliers.

2. Risks include 3C certification suspension, recalls, and after-sales complaints; platforms need to verify manufacturer and production factory information and set up recall monitoring.

3. The article does not elaborate on the latest platform support measures, but rankings, livestreaming, and price-band operations are visible levers.

Overall: The Baseus case offers three research entry points: industry concentration, business model, and compliance governance.

1. Industry landscape: In 2025, the global mobile charging market was RMB244.1 billion, with Anker at 4.8%, Apple at 4.6%, and Baseus at 2.3%. The track is split into technology-brand players, full-category expanders, ecosystem-bundling players, and niche-category players; Baseus sits in the middle via use-case micro-innovation, low pricing, and omnichannel distribution.

2. Business model: It has more than ten categories and over 1,000 SKUs, overseas sales at about 40%, operations in 180+ countries, and more than 300 million users. However, invention patents account for only 6.87%, utility models 56.12%, and design patents 37.01%; category expansion may dilute R&D and weaken supply chain bargaining power.

3. New issues: The 2025 safety storm exposed risks in cell suppliers and contract-manufacturing quality control. About 38 Baseus SKUs had certification suspended and about 38,800 units were recalled; co-drafting the new national standard and switching to EVE Energy and Lishen are remedial measures.

Overall: Policy and implications.

1. Recommendations include strengthening certification, supply chain traceability, and recall mechanisms.

2. Companies need to move from trend-driven volume expansion to technology barriers and brand trust, and to answer whether expansion is a second curve or a dispersion of resources.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

2026年双11,天猫大容量及闪充充电宝热销榜上,倍思自带双线充电宝以“已售60万+”的成绩占据第一名;而在天猫挂耳式耳机热销榜上,倍思两款耳机分别占据了第二和第三名(编者按:榜单数据截至11月9日)。

这并非是倍思第一次斩获这样领先的销售成绩。

2025年双11,天猫移动电源成交榜上,一个熟悉的名字冲到了第一——Baseus倍思旗舰店压过小米官方旗舰店,登上榜首;同一时期的京东总榜,它也稳居前三,走量能力依旧在线。

但把时间往回拨几个月,故事的另一面并不轻松。2025年那场由罗马仕“烧”起来的充电宝安全风暴里,倍思的多个移动电源3C认证证书被暂停,累计涉及的SKU数量,在行业中仅次于罗马仕。

一边是榜单登顶的热闹,一边是安全信任的拷问,这个靠快充起家、把货铺到一百多个国家的深圳品牌,正站在一个微妙的位置上。

如今的倍思已经不满足于只做充电器:从耳机、户外电源到智能摄像头,倍思把货架越铺越宽,营收体量冲到数十亿量级。

可品类越多,质疑声也越多:研发资源被摊薄,新品缺壁垒,上有安克、绿联和手机原厂,下有抖音拼多多上杀到三十九元的白牌。疯狂扩品,究竟是第二增长曲线,还是一场分散兵力的冒险?这家“好看不贵”的配件头部,能不能真正跳出内卷?

01 一家小配件厂的出海逆袭

倍思的故事,要从一部二手手机说起。

创始人何世友1984年出生在潮汕。2006年前后,他从销售二手手机起步,后来卖手机配件、代理国际品牌,在产业链的最底层摸爬滚打了好几年。

2011年,智能手机浪潮刚刚涌起,他在深圳龙岗创立了自己的品牌Baseus,中文名倍思,名字取自“Base on user”,意思是一切从用户出发。

那正是配件行业的黄金年代。2011年第四季度,国内3C类商品销售额已达数百亿元规模,智能手机换机潮带动保护膜、保护壳、数据线等周边需求集中爆发。

最初的倍思,做的就是最不起眼的生意:保护壳、保护膜、数据线这些手机厂商看不上、又人人需要的小配件。没有技术护城河,就靠设计和性价比一点点攒口碑。真正让它跑出来的,是快充。

2019年,倍思推出65W多口氮化镓充电器。体积小、接口全、外观简洁,恰好踩中了手机功率快速上行、用户嫌原装头笨重的需求。这款产品很快在全网卖出名气,据倍思官方数据,到2020年5月前一直稳居同类销量前列。

2021年,倍思充电器出货量达9000万件,每年售出的产品总量超1亿件。一根伸缩线、一颗氮化镓芯片、一个多口快充头,成了它撕开市场的支点。

真正放大它发展势能的,是跨境电商这条快车道。早在2012年,倍思就提前在三十多个国家和地区注册商标,走“农村包围城市”的路线,先拿下购买力够不到高端品牌的东南亚、中东、东欧,再向欧美渗透。

倍思在亚马逊、速卖通、Lazada、Shopee轮番铺开,在多个平台的3C配件类目里稳居头部;TikTok上,它也是排名前三的3C数码品牌;在印度、迪拜、波兰等地,还建起了自己的独立站和本地代理。

早期它以FOB(装运港船上交货)贸易方式供货,后来逐步在美国、日本、印尼等地设立子公司,从卖货转向本地化经营。根据品牌披露的数据,倍思海外销售额约占四成,全球用户超过3亿,产品被卖到180多个国家和地区。

除了渠道红利,行业洗牌也加速了倍思的扩张。过去几年,充电宝、充电器赛道里大量不合规的杂牌被监管清退,市场份额向有品牌、有认证的头部集中,倍思恰好吃下了腾退出来的市场份额。

资本市场也在持续加码。成立十二年后,倍思才迎来首轮机构融资——2023年4月,由深创投、中金资本联合领投的数亿元A轮落地,越秀产业基金、高榕资本跟投;同年12月,又完成深创投领投的数亿元A+轮,资金被投向研发、品牌和海内外渠道建设。

从二十多块钱的伸缩线,到全球出货领先的充电品牌,倍思靠的是踩准风口、跑得快、铺得广。只是很少有人注意到,这套“风口上起量”的逻辑,也埋下了后来的隐患:它习惯追着红利走,而不是造一条自己的“护城河”。

02 从快充到储能,全线扩品的B面

坐稳充电头部之后,倍思没有停下来,而是把货架横向越铺越宽。

如今的倍思已经覆盖十多个品类、上千个SKU:充电类和移动电源是基本盘,向外延展到TWS耳机(真无线耳机)和开放式耳机、车载周边、生活工具类产品,甚至进入便携储能领域。

2022年,它推出600W户外数字储能电源,由公司联合加拿大工程院院士团队共同研发,切入户外露营这门当时高速增长的生意。

渠道端同样是双轮驱动。海外,亚马逊、独立站、速卖通、Lazada、Shopee并进,产品已打进180多个国家和地区,并进入百思买、沃尔玛等线下零售;国内,天猫、京东、抖音同步发力,充电类产品长期占据天猫、京东、抖音数码充电品类的前排。

广品类配广渠道,流水被不断推高。

以抖音为例,倍思抖音官方旗舰店粉丝超225万,根据近30天抖音3C数码配件成交数据榜单,倍思位列第一,高于叠品、罗马仕、图拉斯、爱沃可等品牌。

在抖音直播间内,倍思销量突破10万+台的多为轻量型充电产品及入门级蓝牙耳机,价格在百元左右。

而在天猫baseus倍思旗舰店,销量排行靠前的产品均为基础版充电宝、耳机及充电线,价格不超百元。其他车品配件及生活工具等产品销售均为几千件至上万件,和主营品类销量存在明显差距。

在天猫搜索“充电宝”关键词,倍思品牌排名靠前,相比安克、绿联、图拉斯等品牌有明显价格优势。

倍思横向铺量的底气是价格,但代价也同样在这里显现。

当一条产品线从充电器扩展到耳机、储能、摄像头等数十个品类,每一个赛道都要单独投入调校、供应链和认证,兵力自然被拆散,很难在任何一个新赛道形成压倒性投入。

更重要的是,在3C数码赛道,技术壁垒才是赢得市场竞争的关键,而倍思却并非一家技术导向型公司。

根据启信宝信息,从公开专利结构看,倍思累计申请专利多集中在实用新型和外观设计,专利数量占比分别为56.12%和37.01%,发明专利数量占比仅为6.87%。实用新型专利创造性和技术水平较发明专利低,实用价值更大。

例如倍思在10月30日公开的知识产权专利中,“线材收纳装置”和“耳机装置的连接结构及耳机装置”为实用新型专利,“磁吸支架、磁吸配件及支架组件”则为发明专利。

不难发现,倍思的长项是场景化微创新和外观设计——伸缩线、数显、多口合并,都是在成熟方案上做用户感知层面的改良。而发明专利储备有限,则意味着新品容易被模仿,也很难卖出溢价,最后往往又回到参数对标和价格比较。

技术上没有搭建起严格意义上的“护城河”,同时业务层面还在广撒网,其结果大概率是“什么都做,但什么都没做透”。

多品类扩张同时也意味着在供应链端拿不到绝对的议价权,最终容易陷入“什么都卖、什么都不赚钱”的尴尬。倍思的扩品究竟是“第二增长曲线”,还是用新品类的热闹掩盖老品类的天花板,仍需时间回答。

03 发力新国标,仍靠代工厂?

今天的3C配件赛道,已经不是谁都能赚钱的草莽年代,而倍思恰好被夹在中间。

牌桌上的玩家大致分为四类:安克代表技术品牌派,专利可以跨品类复用;绿联代表全品类扩张派,手握苹果MFi官方认证,普通品牌难以望其项背;小米、华为是生态捆绑派,原厂原装更有优势;图拉斯、闪魔等品牌则深耕细分品类。

倍思和这四类都不太一样:没有安克的研发厚度,没有绿联的自主产能和官方认证,更没有手机厂商的生态,只能依靠场景微创新和较低的价格以及全渠道优势迅速铺开规模。

据充电宝龙头安克创新港股招股书披露数据,2025年全球移动充电市场规模为2441亿元,倍思以2.3%的份额排名第三,居于安克(4.8%)、苹果(4.6%)之后,以此推算2025年倍思收入规模约为56亿元左右。

更棘手的挤压来自两端。向上,手机原厂亲自下场做配件,凭借系统和生态优势抢夺消费心智;向下,白牌用极致低价在内容电商冲量。夹在原厂和白牌之间的“中间地带”,空间越来越窄。

2025年的充电宝安全危机,把这种结构性劣势暴露得尤其充分。受上游电芯供应商安普瑞斯违规更换隔膜材料牵连,罗马仕大规模召回并近乎停摆,市场重新分配份额。

而据行业统计,倍思自身也有约38个SKU的3C认证证书被暂停,数量仅次于罗马仕,并在2025年4月召回了约3.88万台特定型号移动电源。消费端,还出现了大量聚焦质量和售后的黑猫投诉。

一切都有迹可循。回溯生产源头,倍思虽然并非贴牌厂商,但除了大部分充电产品自主生产外,还有少部分充电产品及耳机、数据线等委托给第三方工厂生产。

例如“倍思PicoGo超充Pro三合一伸缩线移动电源”型号为E00338,参数10000mAh、67W,天猫券后价为324元起,在倍思旗舰店中属于高价产品,销量2万+台。

但据中国质量认证中心(CQC官网)披露信息,该款产品制造商为深圳市倍思科技有限公司,生产厂则为湖南炬神电子有限公司,系倍思委托第三方生产。对此品牌旗舰店客服仅表示,倍思产品均由深圳市倍思科技有限公司出品。

今年4月,倍思推出首批符合新国标的移动电源PicoGo卡片磁吸Air,型号E00363,参数10000mAh、30W,在倍思(Baseus)京东自营旗舰店售价298元,已销售6000+件。

而根据中国质量认证中心披露的信息,该款产品制造商为深圳市倍思科技有限公司,生产厂为深圳今翔科技有限公司,系倍思委托后者生产。

且经企查查信息查询,湖南炬神电子有限公司和深圳今翔科技有限公司这两家公司,和深圳市倍思科技有限公司并不存在实际股权关系,系独立第三方代工厂。

不难发现,部分产品依赖代工厂,或是导致倍思品控良莠不齐的关键原因。

过去一年,倍思主要做了三件事:合规补课、供应链重构以及品类延展。

它以新国标参编单位身份推出符合2026版新国标的移动电源,同时将核心电芯供应商切换为亿纬锂能、力神等头部厂商;旗下开放式耳机在2025年第三季度全球出货同比增长约560%,2025双11天猫移动电源店铺成交登顶,也说明走量能力仍在。

但这些动作更多是修补,而非升维。

对倍思而言,真正的考验不是再铺多少个品类、再冲多少个榜单,而是能否在性价比之外,建立起别人拿不走的技术壁垒和可信认知。

当越来越多消费者把技术排在外观和价格前面,比白牌好看、比原厂便宜的套路就有可能不再奏效。如今这道“卷不出去”的难题,倍思必须自己解。

注:文/冯羽,文章来源:创业最前线(公众号ID:chuangyezuiqianxian),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

【版权提示】亿邦动力倡导尊重与保护知识产权。未经许可,任何人不得复制、转载、或以其他方式使用本网站的内容。如发现本站文章存在版权问题,烦请提供版权疑问、身份证明、版权证明、联系方式等发邮件至run@ebrun.com,我们将及时沟通与处理。

已点赞

+1

{{ praise_text }}

好文章,值得被更多人看到

FAQ回顾

倍思是什么品牌,主要做什么产品?

倍思(Baseus)是2011年在深圳龙岗创立的3C配件品牌,名称取自“Base on user”。它以快充充电器、充电宝等移动充电产品起家,后扩展至TWS耳机、开放式耳机、车载周边、便携储能和智能摄像头等十多个品类,产品销往180多个国家和地区,全球用户超过3亿。

倍思在移动充电市场的份额和行业地位如何?

据安克创新港股招股书披露,2025年全球移动充电市场规模为2441亿元,倍思以2.3%的份额排名第三,低于安克4.8%和苹果4.6%,推算2025年收入约56亿元。2025年双11天猫移动电源成交榜登顶,2026年双11大容量及闪充充电宝热销榜以已售60万+居首。

倍思的多品类扩张面临哪些挑战?

倍思已覆盖十多个品类、上千个SKU,但扩品摊薄研发资源,新赛道难形成压倒性投入。其专利中实用新型和外观设计占比56.12%和37.01%,发明专利仅6.87%,长于场景微创新和外观设计,新品易被模仿、难卖溢价,同时受安克、绿联、手机原厂和白牌两端挤压。

倍思如何应对充电宝新国标和安全危机?

2025年充电宝安全风暴中,倍思约38个SKU的3C认证证书被暂停,数量仅次于罗马仕,并于2025年4月召回约3.88万台特定型号移动电源。此后倍思以新国标参编单位身份推出符合2026版新国标的移动电源,并将核心电芯供应商切换为亿纬锂能、力神等头部厂商。

倍思部分产品被指依赖代工厂,具体情况如何?

中国质量认证中心信息显示,倍思PicoGo超充Pro三合一伸缩线移动电源E00338生产厂为湖南炬神电子,PicoGo卡片磁吸Air E00363生产厂为深圳今翔科技,二者均为独立第三方代工厂。倍思大部分充电产品自主生产,但少部分充电产品及耳机、数据线委托第三方生产,或是品控良莠不齐的原因之一。

广告

下一篇

征集报名《品牌数字化服务商资源手册》

《品牌数字化服务商资源手册》展示数字化服务商风采,亿邦全年零售大会通发,触达更多资源,马上加入!

马上入驻

11月11日电商早报:泡泡玛特Q3营收降45%;欧盟取消IOSS 150欧元上限

泡泡玛特Q3营收降45%;欧盟取消IOSS 150欧元上限

家居 京东 居家用品 泡泡玛特

2026-11-11 06:55:12