• 亿邦公众号
    • APP下载

盈利新高市值蒸发:谁在砸盘存储股?

作者:硅谷Tech news 文章来源:钛媒体

2026-07-10 10:30

作者:硅谷Tech news 文章来源:钛媒体

2026-07-10 10:30

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心解答了近期全球存储芯片板块利润创新高却股价暴跌的疑问,拆解了事件来龙去脉,核心干货如下:

1. 此次存储股大跌并非行业周期见顶,也不是基本面恶化,本质是SK海力士以ADR形式赴美IPO募资,国际机构卖出韩国市场持有的正股腾挪资金认购ADR,属于跨市场资金搬家,卖压释放后股价已经快速回弹。

2. 三星电子单季营业利润创全球科技企业新纪录,同比涨1810%却股价跳水,一方面是好消息提前被市场充分炒作,属于买预期卖事实,另一方面是被SK海力士的抛售连带影响,叠加短期情绪放大了跌幅。

3. 当前存储芯片行业基本面没有发生变化,需求和价格仍保持上涨,HBM高端订单已经排到2030年,短期恐慌不改变长期景气趋势。

此次存储板块异动给存储品牌商带来了明确的行业趋势参考和经营方向,核心干货如下:

1. 消费需求趋势已经发生根本性切换,原来存储芯片需求主体是手机和PC,现在已经转为AI服务器,预计2026年DRAM需求中服务器占比将突破50%,品牌商需要调整产品结构和产能分配,适配新的需求结构。

2. 价格层面当前行业仍处于上涨通道,三季度DRAM合约价预计环比上涨13%-18%,NAND上涨10%-15%,三星计划上调DRAM均价最多20%,品牌定价可跟随行业趋势调整,行业定价权没有因为股价下跌发生变化。

3. 品牌经营需要锚定真实基本面,不要被短期市场资金波动、情绪扰动影响判断,当前HBM等高端产品需求长期旺盛,需要提前布局卡位,同时可关注常规DRAM当前利润率更高的机会,灵活调整产能。

本次存储芯片板块异动给存储产业链相关卖家释放了明确的机会和风险信号,核心干货如下:

1. 政策层面,韩国政府已经官宣总投资超1800万亿韩元的三大国家级项目,其中半导体领域投资约800万亿韩元,将新建多个晶圆厂,会带动存储产业链上下游环节的长期增长机会,相关卖家可提前对接布局。

2. 需求机会方面,AI服务器拉动存储需求快速增长,高端HBM订单已经排到2030年,同时目前常规DRAM的营业利润率已经反超HBM,卖家可关注常规DRAM领域的相关需求机会,匹配市场变化调整备货方向。

3. 风险提示方面,短期股价波动容易受跨市场资金流动、个别行业事件影响,不能将短期股价下跌等同于行业周期拐点,避免错判形势提前离场,同时需要警惕权重股波动带来的整个板块连带风险,做好应对准备。

本次存储芯片行业的变化给存储生产工厂带来了明确的生产方向和商业机会,核心干货如下:

1. 产品生产需求层面,行业需求结构已经发生转变,AI服务器取代传统手机PC成为最大需求来源,工厂需要调整产能结构适配新需求,当前晶圆产能属于刚性资源,在保证HBM高端订单交付的前提下,可将更多产能转向常规DRAM,目前常规DRAM利润率已经反超HBM,能带来更高收益。

2. 商业机会层面,当前存储芯片行业基本面景气,价格持续上涨,利润创新高,不存在产能过剩问题,韩国大规模新建晶圆厂的计划,会带动上游零部件生产、配套代工等环节的大量商业机会,相关工厂可对接获取订单。

3. 行业周期层面,存储是重资产长周期行业,新建晶圆厂从动工到满产需要18到36个月,本次韩国新建产能真正释放要等到2030年前后,短期不存在产能过剩风险,工厂可抓住当前景气周期安排生产,获取更高收益。

存储芯片行业当前出现了很多新发展趋势,给产业链相关服务商带来了新的业务机会,核心干货如下:

1. 行业发展趋势层面,当前存储芯片需求结构已经完成切换,AI服务器成为第一大需求来源,高端存储HBM需求长期旺盛,订单已经排到2030年,行业整体基本面保持景气,价格持续上涨,短期没有出现周期拐点,行业整体增长空间大。

2. 客户痛点层面,当前晶圆产能属于刚性资源,高端HBM和常规DRAM的产能分配存在矛盾,同时存储龙头厂商开始大举扩产,对半导体生产设备的需求大幅提升,相关设备、产能规划服务商可抓住这个需求增量,拓展业务。

3. 新的业务机会层面,短期跨市场资本流动、个别行业事件容易引发板块大幅波动,企业需要应对短期情绪波动带来的经营和市值管理扰动,相关咨询、风险管理服务商可针对性开发相关服务,满足企业新的需求。

本次存储芯片跨市场套利引发的波动,给面向半导体产业的平台商带来了多方面的运营启示,核心干货如下:

1. 风险规避层面,跨市场资本流动会引发本土市场权重股的大幅波动,甚至带动大盘出现大幅下跌,平台需要完善短期大幅波动的风险应对机制,本次韩国市场已经多次触发熔断,平台可参考完善熔断、风险提示等应对机制,防范系统性风险。

2. 业务拓展层面,当前半导体行业处于高景气周期,存储芯片行业有大量新产能建设、企业跨市场上市融资的需求,平台可针对性推出适配半导体企业的上市、融资、产业链对接服务,吸引优质存储芯片、半导体设备企业入驻,拓展平台招商资源。

3. 运营管理层面,需要警惕个别行业事件引发的情绪扩散,避免不必要的系统性恐慌,平台要及时做好投资者引导,传递准确的行业基本面信息,维护市场的稳定运行,减少情绪带来的异常波动。

本次存储芯片板块的异常波动,呈现了存储产业很多新动向,为产业研究提供了新的研究样本,核心干货如下:

1. 产业新动向方面,存储芯片的需求结构已经发生根本性变化,AI服务器取代传统手机PC成为最大需求来源,原来存储行业两三年一轮的周期性涨跌规律可能发生改变,本次产能调整是有限产能的重新分配,不是过去产能过剩后的行业收缩,行业逻辑已经发生变化。

2. 新问题层面,企业跨市场上市融资会引发本土市场的跨市场套利波动,导致股价走势和行业基本面短期完全背离,这种资金驱动的波动和基本面无关,如何区分资金波动和真正的行业周期变化,成为产业研究需要关注的新问题。

3. 格局和政策层面,当前全球存储依旧是三星、SK海力士、美光三强垄断近九成产能的格局,韩国政府投入800万亿韩元发展半导体产业,将深刻影响未来全球存储产业的竞争格局,其政策效果值得长期跟踪研究。

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article addresses the recent paradox of the global memory chip sector hitting record profits while seeing sharp share price declines, breaking down the full context of the event:

1. The recent sell-off in memory chip stocks does not signal a cyclical peak or deteriorating industry fundamentals. It stems from SK Hynix’s ADR IPO offering in the U.S., where international institutions sold existing SK Hynix shares listed on the South Korean market to free up capital for the ADR subscription, in what is essentially cross-market capital reallocation. Share prices have already bounced back rapidly once the selling pressure eased.

2. Samsung Electronics posted a new all-time record quarterly operating profit for global tech companies, with a 1810% year-on-year surge, yet its share price still dropped. On one hand, the positive results had already been fully priced in by the market, resulting in a classic "buy the rumor, sell the fact" pullback. On the other, it was dragged down by the selling pressure surrounding SK Hynix, with short-term market sentiment amplifying losses.

3. The core fundamentals of the memory chip industry remain unchanged, with demand and prices still on the rise. High-end HBM orders are already booked out through 2030, and short-term panic will not alter the industry’s long-term growth trajectory.

This recent sector volatility offers clear industry trend insights and strategic guidance for memory chip brands:

1. Consumer demand for memory chips has undergone a fundamental structural shift. The primary demand driver has shifted from smartphones and PCs to AI servers, and server demand is projected to account for over 50% of total DRAM demand by 2026. Brands need to adjust their product mix and capacity allocation to adapt to this new demand structure.

2. Prices remain in an upward industry cycle. Q3 DRAM contract prices are expected to rise 13%-18% quarter-on-quarter, while NAND prices will climb 10%-15%. Samsung plans to raise average DRAM prices by up to 20%, so brands can adjust their pricing in line with industry trends. Industry pricing power has not shifted following the share price decline.

3. Brands should anchor their strategy on actual industry fundamentals rather than being distracted by short-term capital flows and market sentiment. With long-term strong demand for high-end products like HBM, brands should secure market position through early布局. At the same time, they can capitalize on the currently higher profit margins of conventional DRAM and adjust capacity allocation flexibly.

The recent volatility in the memory chip sector sends clear signals of both opportunities and risks for sellers across the memory supply chain:

1. On the policy front, the South Korean government has announced three national-level projects totaling over 1,800 trillion won in investment, with around 800 trillion won allocated to the semiconductor sector, including plans for multiple new wafer fabs. This will drive long-term growth across the memory industry supply chain, and relevant sellers can pursue early布局 and partnership opportunities.

2. For demand opportunities, AI servers are driving rapid growth in memory demand, with high-end HBM orders already booked through 2030. At the same time, operating margins for conventional DRAM have now surpassed those of HBM, so sellers can pursue demand opportunities in the conventional DRAM segment and adjust inventory mix in line with market shifts.

3. For risk awareness, short-term share price volatility is often driven by cross-border capital flows and isolated industry events, and a short-term price drop should not be misread as a cyclical inflection point—sellers should avoid exiting prematurely based on misjudgment. They should also prepare for spillover risks across the entire sector driven by volatility in large-cap weighted stocks.

The recent shifts in the memory chip industry provide clear production guidance and new business opportunities for memory manufacturing facilities:

1. For production demand, the industry’s demand structure has shifted: AI servers have overtaken traditional smartphones and PCs to become the largest demand source. Factories need to adjust their capacity structure to align with the new demand profile. Wafer capacity is currently a rigid constrained resource. While meeting delivery commitments for high-end HBM orders, factories can shift more additional capacity to conventional DRAM, which now offers higher profit margins than HBM and can generate greater returns.

2. For business opportunities, the memory chip industry remains on a solid growth trajectory with rising prices and record profits, and there is no existing overcapacity. South Korea’s large-scale new fab construction plan will generate substantial new business opportunities for upstream component manufacturing and contract manufacturing, and relevant factories can pursue new orders through business development.

3. For industry cycle dynamics, memory is a capital-intensive, long-cycle industry. It takes 18 to 36 months from the start of construction for a new fab to reach full production, so the new South Korean capacity will not come online until around 2030. There is no near-term overcapacity risk, so factories can scale up production during the current upcycle to maximize returns.

Emerging trends in the memory chip industry are creating new business opportunities for service providers across the semiconductor supply chain:

1. For industry trends, the memory chip demand structure has completed its shift, with AI servers now the largest demand source. High-end HBM demand remains strong long-term, with orders already booked through 2030. The industry’s core fundamentals remain solid, prices continue to rise, there is no near-term cyclical inflection point, and the industry retains large overall growth room.

2. For client pain points, wafer capacity is a rigid constrained resource, creating tradeoffs in capacity allocation between high-end HBM and conventional DRAM. Meanwhile, leading memory manufacturers have launched large-scale capacity expansion plans, driving a sharp increase in demand for semiconductor manufacturing equipment. Equipment and capacity planning service providers can capture this incremental demand and expand their business.

3. For new business opportunities, short-term cross-market capital flows and isolated industry events can trigger large sector-wide volatility. Companies need support to manage operational and market capitalization disruptions driven by short-term sentiment swings. Consulting and risk management service providers can develop tailored services to meet this new corporate demand.

The volatility triggered by this cross-market capital reallocation in memory chips offers multiple operational insights for semiconductor industry-focused platform operators:

1. For risk mitigation, cross-market capital flows can trigger sharp volatility in large-cap domestic stocks, even drive broad market declines. Platforms need to improve risk response mechanisms for extreme short-term volatility. The South Korean market triggered multiple circuit breakers during this event, and platforms can reference this experience to improve circuit breaker mechanisms and risk alerts to prevent systemic risk.

2. For business expansion, the semiconductor industry is currently in a high-growth cycle, with memory chip companies having strong demand for new capacity construction and cross-market listing and financing. Platforms can develop tailored listing, financing and supply chain matching services for semiconductor companies, to attract high-quality memory chip and semiconductor equipment companies to onboard and expand the platform’s merchant base.

3. For operational management, platforms need to guard against sentiment contagion triggered by isolated industry events that can spark unnecessary systemic panic. Platforms should provide timely guidance to investors, communicate accurate information on industry fundamentals, maintain orderly market operation, and reduce abnormal volatility driven by herd sentiment.

The abnormal volatility in the memory chip sector reveals new industry dynamics and provides a new research sample for industrial analysis:

1. For new industry dynamics, the memory chip demand structure has undergone a fundamental shift, with AI servers overtaking traditional smartphones and PCs to become the largest demand source. The traditional industry pattern of 2-3 year boom-bust cycles may now change. The current capacity adjustment is a reallocation of limited existing capacity, not an industry contraction after overcapacity, meaning the core industry logic has shifted.

2. For new research questions, cross-market listing and financing by incumbent companies can trigger arbitrage-driven volatility in the company’s home market, leading to a complete short-term disconnect between share price performance and industry fundamentals. Distinguishing between this capital-driven volatility and actual cyclical industry shifts has emerged as a new key question for industrial research.

3. For market structure and policy, the global memory industry remains dominated by a three-firm oligopoly: Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron control nearly 90% of total global capacity. The South Korean government’s 800 trillion won investment in the semiconductor sector will reshape the competitive landscape of the global memory industry long-term, and the policy’s impact warrants sustained research tracking.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

过去一周,全球存储芯片板块经历了一场教科书级别的多空拉锯。从美股到韩股,从费城半导体指数到KOSPI,恐慌与反弹在72小时内交替登场。昨夜美股率先止跌,费城半导体指数收涨2.23%,存储概念板块反弹,闪迪涨超6%,英伟达涨超3%,美光涨超1%。

今天开盘,韩国市场紧随其后,KOSPI涨超3%,三星电子涨近4%,SK海力士大涨7.42%。但仅仅两天前,这些数字的符号还是反的。

三星电子近日交出了一份足以载入科技史的财报。营业利润89.4万亿韩元,同比暴涨1810%,超18倍。单季利润超过了英伟达此前创下的季度盈利纪录,刷新了全球科技企业单季营业利润纪录。三星管理层甚至说,今年的利润将超过公司过去40年半导体业务的利润总和。

但当天三星股价开盘就跳水,盘中最深跌幅一度接近10%,还拖累KOSPI大盘盘中跌超8%,触发年内第六次熔断。

利润创纪录,股价却大跌。但这背后并非“周期见顶”,真正的推手另有其人。

真凶不是周期

这一轮韩国存储股暴跌,最直接的推手不是周期,是SK海力士的ADR发行。

7月10日,SK海力士在纳斯达克挂牌,以ADR形式上市,募资约280亿美元,是全球迄今最大的外国公司赴美IPO。认购订单超额数倍,基石投资者锁定70亿美元。

问题出在这里。大量国际机构想买ADR,但手里没有美元现金,于是卖出韩国市场上持有的SK海力士正股,腾出资金去认购美股ADR。瑞银7月7日发布的报告中,白纸黑字建议投资者“买入ADR、卖出韩股”。

这不是个别行为。韩国交易所数据显示,外资已连续13个交易日净卖出韩股,主板单日净卖出最高达3421亿韩元。13个交易日,意味着抛售从6月19日前后就开始了,比Meta宣布卖算力早了将近两周。

SK海力士作为KOSPI权重最大的个股之一,首当其冲。从6月25日的历史高点298.7万韩元,到7月7日收报220.1万韩元,两周跌去超过26%。同一条逻辑链上的三星电子,被连带砸了下去。7月8日KOSPI较6月历史高点跌超20%,进入技术性熊市。

这不是基本面在恶化,是资金在搬家。

7月9日的反弹恰好印证了这一点。ADR定价落定当天,SK海力士早盘直线拉涨9.2%。卖压释放,股价立刻回弹。如果真是周期见顶,反弹不会来得这么干脆。

那7月1日Meta宣布推出MetaCompute,把AI算力对外出租,当天费城半导体指数暴跌超6%,美光、闪迪跌超10%,又怎么算?

这是一把火。但它烧的是“AI基建可持续性”的叙事,不是存储周期本身。

过去两年这轮牛市的地基,是一个简单到近乎信仰的假设,算力永远不够用。Meta让市场第一次质疑这个前提,如果头部厂商开始把闲置算力租出去变现,是不是扩张速度已经超过了真实需求?有市场分析提出过一个框架叫“反身性”,只要有一家巨头证明“用更少资本开支也能做出同等产出”,市场就会奖励它,而这种奖励可能诱使整个行业提前踩刹车。

这个逻辑对英伟达和GPU产业链有意义。但SK海力士的HBM订单已经排到2030年,三星存储利润还在创新高。Meta卖算力和存储芯片供需之间,还隔着一层。

美股半导体暴跌和韩股存储暴跌,看似同步,实则是两个不同故事在同一个时间窗口里撞上了。真正让韩国存储股连跌两周的,是ADR套利资金。

三星为什么跌

回到三星。它的下跌有两层。

第一层是“买预期卖事实”。截至7月初,三星股价今年累计上涨约158%,SK海力士涨约273%,美光涨约242%。“利润暴涨18倍”这个数字,LSEG综合30家机构在财报前就摆上了桌面。好消息被反复讨论太久,缺一份新惊喜。利润和营收其实都跑赢了市场一致预期,89.4万亿韩元利润远超84.2万亿的预测,171万亿韩元营收也高于169.2万亿的共识。但这份“意外之喜”一点也不意外。

第二层是ADR资金流的连带伤害。外资卖SK海力士时不会只卖一只,三星作为韩国市场第二大权重股,被一起砸了下去。再加上公司要拿出半导体部门10.5%利润做员工特别奖金,7月还有内部抗议安排,情绪进一步放大。

有业内人士向媒体分析,资本的关注焦点正在从存储芯片本身转向上游半导体设备商。存储龙头开始大举扩产,意味着接下来要花大钱采购设备,这笔钱流向日、美、欧的设备厂商,而不是继续停留在三星、SK海力士的报表里。

但这些只是解释了“这一天”和“这一周”为什么跌。决定这轮存储周期能走多远的,不在这里。

半导体这条产业链上,最容易误读的是存储芯片。

DRAM(电脑、手机、服务器里都要用的一种内存芯片,负责临时存取运行数据,是存储芯片里份额最大的一类)市场,长期由三星、SK海力士、美光三家把控,合计占了全球近九成产能。这是一门重资产、长周期的生意,一座12英寸晶圆厂从动工到满产要18到36个月,投资动辄一两百亿美元。

过去,存储行业有个很朴素的周期规律,需求好就涨价,厂商跟风扩产,供给追上来就跌价。两三年一轮回。

这一轮拉动需求的主体换了人。以前是手机和PC,现在是AI服务器。2026年,DRAM需求中服务器占比首次突破50%,两年前这个比例还在三分之一左右。

产能分配上,6月下旬有一个变化,多个信源显示,SK海力士正在放缓HBM4产线的转换节奏,把更多产能转回常规DRAM,原因是常规DRAM的营业利润率已经反超HBM。这不代表SK海力士要退出HBM。6月初,它刚和英伟达宣布达成多年期HBM联合开发合作,AI内存主要订单已排到2030年。但晶圆产能是刚性的,多给HBM一片,常规DRAM就少一片。

供给端,韩国政府6月底官宣了总投资逾1800万亿韩元的三大国家级项目,其中半导体部分投资约800万亿韩元,联合三星、SK在西南地区新建晶圆厂。但2026到2027年新厂还在土建阶段,真正把缺口填平大概率要等到2030年前后。

价格上,方向没有变。7月3日,集邦咨询发布三季度价格预测,DRAM合约价预计环比上涨13%到18%,NAND上涨10%到15%。同一天,三星计划把三季度DRAM均价上调最多20%;瑞银把三季度DDR合约价预测从17%一次性上修到32%。

涨幅比二季度收窄了,但这是消费电子需求跟不上、涨价基数太高之后的自然回落,不是AI需求降温。

在股价最恐慌的那几天里,决定行业景气度的定价权,并没有跟着股价一起崩。

拐点到底到了没有?

“拐点”这个词,放在不同维度上,指的根本不是同一件事。

从资金流看,韩股存储股这两周的暴跌,是一场机械性的跨市场套利。外资卖韩股买ADR,跟存储周期一点关系都没有。7月9日定价落定,卖压释放,股价立刻回弹。

从情绪和估值看,确实有一层松动在发生,但更多是Meta引发的AI capex叙事动摇,波及的是GPU产业链,不是存储本身。三星“买预期卖事实”的成分更大一些,但也被ADR资金流放大了。

从产能结构看,眼下发生的更像是“分工”。不是产能过剩后的收缩,而是重新调配一块不够用的蛋糕。

从需求和价格看,目前没有拐点的影子。Q3合约价还在涨,HBM订单排到2030年。这条最慢的曲线,才决定着存储周期能走多远。

利润在创新高,产能没有过剩,价格还在涨。存储芯片的基本面什么都没变,只是资金地址从首尔,搬到了纽约。

注:文/硅谷Tech news,文章来源:钛媒体(公众号ID:taimeiti),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

【版权提示】亿邦动力倡导尊重与保护知识产权。未经许可,任何人不得复制、转载、或以其他方式使用本网站的内容。如发现本站文章存在版权问题,烦请提供版权疑问、身份证明、版权证明、联系方式等发邮件至run@ebrun.com,我们将及时沟通与处理。

已点赞

+1

{{ praise_text }}

好文章,值得被更多人看到

FAQ回顾

存储芯片股盈利创新高反而下跌的原因是什么?

韩股存储股下跌核心是SK海力士发行ADR引发跨市场套利,外资卖出韩股正股腾挪资金认购ADR,三星下跌还叠加“买预期卖事实”,此前利好已充分消化。美股存储板块下跌是Meta出租闲置算力引发AI基建叙事短期动摇,和存储基本面无关。

存储芯片行业周期是否已经见顶?

当前存储芯片行业并未见顶,基本面保持向好,2024年三季度DRAM合约价预计环比上涨13%-18%,NAND上涨10%-15%,SK海力士HBM订单已排到2030年,本轮下跌是资金套利和情绪影响,产能、需求、价格均未出现拐点信号。

当前存储芯片的核心需求拉动因素是什么?

当前存储芯片核心需求拉动主体已从过去的手机、PC转向AI服务器,预计2026年服务器需求在DRAM需求中的占比将首次突破50%,常规DRAM营业利润率目前已反超HBM,厂商正调整产能分配适配需求结构。

全球DRAM市场的主要供应商有哪些?

全球DRAM市场长期由三星、SK海力士、美光三家企业主导,三者合计占据全球近九成产能。DRAM是存储芯片中份额最大的品类,广泛应用于电脑、手机、服务器等产品,负责临时存取运行数据。

广告

下一篇

征集报名《品牌数字化服务商资源手册》

《品牌数字化服务商资源手册》展示数字化服务商风采,亿邦全年零售大会通发,触达更多资源,马上加入!

马上入驻

葛卫东投量子计算了

逻辑比特能在这轮凑齐这样的投资方名单,并不只是因为它的技术底子厚,还有一个隐形的趋势,量子计算的投资逻辑更精细了。

品牌故事 未来零售

2026-07-10 10:17:58