• 亿邦公众号
    • APP下载

接连关店的植物护肤老牌困在“菌菇水”里

作者:李斌 文章来源:创业最前线

2026-06-22 07:17

作者:李斌 文章来源:创业最前线

2026-06-22 07:17

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文梳理了国际植物护肤老牌悦木之源从高光到衰落的全过程,核心干货信息如下:

1. 悦木之源是雅诗兰黛集团旗下品牌,1990年创立,定位天然植物护肤,早年提前押注成分赛道,靠创新产品和口碑积累走红,2010年进入中国市场后,凭借明星单品菌菇水成为很多年轻消费者的护肤启蒙,曾经是植物护肤赛道的先行者。

2. 近年来悦木之源增长乏力,多次拖累集团业绩,近期接连撤出中国台湾、中国香港的线下实体专柜,全面退守线上渠道。

3. 当前植物护肤赛道仍保持增长,但市场规则已经改变,消费者选品不再唯品牌出身论,更看重功效、成分迭代速度和性价比,普通消费者可以参考这一行业变化,选择更适配自身需求的高性价比护肤产品。

本文通过悦木之源的衰落案例,给植物护肤品牌总结了可参考的经验教训,核心内容如下:

1. 行业与消费趋势:当前全球植物护肤赛道仍在增长,2025年全球天然绿色化妆品销售额达480亿美元,年复合增长率12%,但国货品牌已经占据纯净护肤领域54%的市场份额,实现对国际品牌的反超,消费者更看重成分迭代、功效、性价比,靠单一大爆品吃老本的模式已经行不通。

2. 产品研发层面:悦木之源过度依赖菌菇水,20年仅升级3次配方,更新速度远慢于国货品牌,竞争力持续下滑;逆势涨价进一步加剧了用户流失。

3. 渠道运营层面:过度依赖线下专柜,疫情后线下客流下滑,但线上转型滞后,粉丝量、直播转化都远低于国货品牌,最终被消费者遗忘。

4. 战略层面:中端定位在集团聚焦高端品牌的资源倾斜逻辑下,战略优先级低,很容易被边缘化。

本文分析了植物护肤赛道的最新变化,给美妆卖家梳理了当前的机会、风险与可借鉴经验,核心内容如下:

1. 市场机会:全球天然植物护肤赛道仍处于扩张期,年复合增长率达到12%,市场空间充足,且国货品牌已经实现对国际品牌的反超,本土美妆卖家仍有较大的增长空间。

2. 消费需求变化:当下消费者选品不再看重品牌出身,转而更关注成分功效验证、产品快速迭代能力和性价比,原来靠老牌光环、单爆品就能盈利的模式已经失效。

3. 风险提示:过度依赖线下专柜、免税渠道的卖家需要警惕线下客流下滑的风险,若不及时转型线上,很容易被市场淘汰。

4. 可学习经验:可以学习头部国货品牌的玩法,挖掘本土差异化植物成分,保持产品的快速迭代,做好线上内容种草和直播运营,打造性价比优势,抢占用户心智。

本文分析了植物护肤行业的最新变化,给美妆工厂在产品研发、业务拓展和数字化转型方向都提供了启示,核心内容如下:

1. 产品生产与设计需求变化:当前消费者对植物护肤的需求已经从概念走向实际功效,要求品牌保持产品的快速迭代升级,工厂需要提升配方研发、功效验证的能力,跟上品牌的推新节奏,满足市场对功效型产品的需求。

2. 商业拓展机会:当前国货植物护肤品牌增长势头强劲,市场份额已经反超国际品牌,且国货品牌对推新速度、研发支持的需求更高,工厂可以锚定优质国货品牌拓展合作,抓住新一轮的增长机会。

3. 数字化与电商转型启示:如果工厂布局自有品牌,必须重视线上渠道尤其是直播电商的运营,做好用户内容种草,不能再沿袭只重生产、依赖线下渠道的传统模式,要跟上渠道转移的行业趋势。

本文梳理了植物护肤行业的发展现状和痛点,给美妆相关服务商指明了业务方向,核心内容如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:当前全球植物护肤赛道仍保持12%的年复合增长率,市场持续扩容,同时竞争格局发生重大变化,国货品牌替代国际老牌的趋势明显,催生了大量新的服务需求,行业服务商的市场空间充足。

2. 客户痛点:传统老牌国际植物护肤品牌,普遍存在产品迭代慢、线上运营能力弱、过度依赖线下渠道的问题,转型需求迫切;新兴国货品牌增长快,对成分研发、功效验证、线上直播运营的专业服务需求强烈。

3. 业务布局方向:服务商可以针对传统国际老牌推出线上运营转型咨询、产品升级方案设计等服务,抓住老牌转型的需求;同时针对新兴国货品牌,提供本土成分挖掘、功效验证、直播代运营等配套服务,匹配当前市场的需求,拓展自身业务边界。

本文分析了当前美妆品牌的发展变化,给美妆平台的招商、运营管理和风险规避都提供了参考,核心内容如下:

1. 品牌需求变化:大量传统国际中端品牌正在收缩线下渠道,集体退守线上,对平台的线上流量扶持、直播运营转化支持提出了更高的需求,老牌线上转型的服务需求凸显。

2. 招商方向调整:当前国货植物护肤品牌增长势头好,用户认可度高,在粉丝体量、直播转化等核心数据上都远超传统国际老牌,平台可以加大对优质国货植物护肤品牌的招商和扶持力度,优化平台的品牌供给结构,适配消费者需求。

3. 风险规避方向:平台需要跟进品牌端的变化,对过度依赖单爆品、增长乏力、集团资源支持不足的品牌,提前做好风险应对;同时顺应消费者看重功效、性价比的趋势,引导入驻品牌优化产品结构和运营模式,提升平台整体的经营效率和用户满意度。

本文以悦木之源的衰落为案例,展现了当前中国美妆产业的新变化,给产业研究提供了典型样本和研究方向,核心内容如下:

1. 产业新动向:当前植物护肤赛道仍保持稳定增长,国货品牌已经在纯净护肤领域实现对国际品牌的反超,市场竞争格局彻底改写;消费者的决策逻辑已经从看重品牌出身,转向关注成分、功效、性价比,直播电商成为品牌核心增长渠道,传统靠单爆品、线下专柜盈利的商业模式已经失效。

2. 产业新问题:国际美妆集团近年来普遍存在战略保守、产品更新频率低、运营风格固化的问题,在集团收缩非核心品牌、聚焦高端奢华品牌的战略调整下,定位中端的老牌护肤品牌很容易被边缘化,陷入增长失速的困境。

3. 研究方向启示:研究者可以进一步围绕国际美妆集团品牌组合战略调整对中端品牌的影响、国货植物品牌的产品迭代运营模式、新竞争环境下美妆品牌的增长逻辑等方向展开研究,总结美妆行业竞争的新规则。

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article traces the full trajectory of Origins, a long-established international plant-based skincare brand, from its peak popularity to its decline, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Origins was founded in 1990 under the Estée Lauder Group, positioned as a natural plant-based skincare brand. It entered the market early as an ingredients-focused pioneer, built its reputation through innovative products and word-of-mouth, and launched in the Chinese mainland in 2010. Its star product, Dr. Andrew Weil Mega-Mushroom Relief & Resilience Soothing Treatment Lotion (commonly known as "Mushroom Water"), became the introductory skincare product for many young Chinese consumers, cementing its status as an early leader in the plant-based skincare segment.

2. In recent years, Origins has struggled to grow and has repeatedly dragged down the group's overall performance. It has recently closed all offline counters in Taiwan, China and Hong Kong, China, retreating entirely to online channels.

3. While the plant-based skincare category continues to grow, market rules have shifted: consumers no longer choose products based purely on brand origin, and instead prioritize efficacy, fast ingredient iteration and cost-effectiveness. General consumers can leverage this industry shift to select high-value skincare products better aligned with their needs.

Through the case study of Origins' decline, this article summarizes key lessons for plant-based skincare brands, with core insights as follows:

1. Industry and consumer trends: The global plant-based skincare market is still growing, with global sales of natural and green cosmetics projected to reach $48 billion by 2025 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12%. However, domestic Chinese brands now hold 54% of the clean beauty market, overtaking international brands. Today's consumers prioritize fast ingredient iteration, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness, and the legacy model of relying on a single blockbuster product is no longer viable.

2. Product R&D: Origins is overly reliant on its Mushroom Water blockbuster, which only had 3 formula upgrades over 20 years. Its update pace is far slower than domestic Chinese brands, leading to steady competitiveness erosion. Price hikes against market trends further accelerated user churn.

3. Channel operations: Origins relied heavily on offline counters. Following post-pandemic declines in offline foot traffic, its online transformation lagged significantly behind domestic competitors, with far smaller follower bases and much lower live-stream conversion rates, ultimately leading to it being forgotten by consumers.

4. Corporate strategy: As a mid-tier positioned brand, it held low strategic priority within Estée Lauder's resource allocation strategy focused on high-end luxury brands, making it easy for the brand to become marginalized.

This article analyzes the latest shifts in the plant-based skincare segment, and outlines opportunities, risks, and actionable lessons for beauty sellers, as follows:

1. Market opportunities: The global natural plant-based skincare market is still expanding at a CAGR of 12%, with sufficient room for growth. Domestic Chinese brands have already overtaken international brands, leaving considerable growth headroom for local Chinese beauty sellers.

2. Shifting consumer demand: Consumers no longer prioritize brand origin when selecting skincare products, and instead focus on validated ingredient efficacy, fast product iteration, and cost-effectiveness. The old model of generating steady profits from a legacy brand reputation and a single blockbuster product no longer works.

3. Risk warning: Sellers overly reliant on offline counters and duty-free channels should be alert to the risks of declining foot traffic. Failure to transform to online operations in time can easily lead to being eliminated from the market.

4. Actionable lessons: Sellers can learn from the strategies adopted by leading domestic Chinese brands: tap into differentiated local plant ingredients, maintain fast product iteration, build a strong presence through online content marketing and live-stream operations, and leverage cost advantages to capture consumer mindshare.

This article analyzes the latest industry shifts in plant-based skincare, and provides insights for beauty factories across product R&D, business expansion, and digital transformation, as follows:

1. Shifting product manufacturing and design demands: Consumer demand for plant-based skincare has evolved from conceptual interest to proven efficacy, and brands are required to deliver frequent product upgrades and iteration. Factories need to strengthen their capabilities in formula R&D and efficacy validation to keep up with brands' new product launch pace, and meet market demand for effective skincare products.

2. Business expansion opportunities: Domestic Chinese plant-based skincare brands are growing rapidly and have overtaken international brands in market share. Unlike legacy players, domestic brands have much higher demand for fast new product launches and R&D support. Factories can target high-quality domestic brands to expand partnerships and capture new growth opportunities.

3. Insights for digital and e-commerce transformation: For factories building their own DTC brands, it is critical to prioritize online channel operations, especially live-stream e-commerce, and invest in consumer-focused content marketing. The traditional model of focusing only on manufacturing and relying on offline distribution is outdated, and factories must adapt to the industry-wide shift to online channels.

This article outlines the current development status and pain points of the plant-based skincare industry, and points out new business directions for beauty-related service providers, as follows:

1. Industry development trends: The global plant-based skincare market continues to grow at a 12% CAGR, with continuous market expansion. At the same time, the competitive landscape has shifted dramatically: the trend of domestic Chinese brands replacing legacy international brands is clear, which has generated a large volume of new service demand, creating ample market space for industry service providers.

2. Client pain points: Legacy international plant-based skincare brands generally suffer from slow product iteration, weak online operation capabilities, and over-reliance on offline channels, creating urgent demand for transformation support. Fast-growing emerging domestic brands have strong demand for professional services including ingredient R&D, efficacy validation, and online live-stream operations.

3. Business layout direction: Service providers can offer online transformation consulting and product upgrade design services to legacy international brands to capture their transformation demand. For emerging domestic brands, providers can offer supporting services including local ingredient exploration, efficacy validation, and live-stream operation outsourcing to match current market demand and expand their own business boundaries.

This article analyzes the current shifts in the beauty brand space, and provides references for beauty platforms in merchant recruitment, operations management, and risk mitigation, as follows:

1. Shifting brand demand: A large number of traditional mid-tier international brands are shrinking offline channels and retreating en masse to online. This has created strong, growing demand for platform support in online traffic access and live-stream conversion, highlighting unmet service needs for the online transformation of legacy brands.

2. Merchant recruitment adjustment: Domestic Chinese plant-based skincare brands are currently growing strongly, enjoy high consumer recognition, and outperform traditional international brands by core metrics including follower volume and live-stream conversion. Platforms can increase recruitment and support for high-quality domestic plant-based skincare brands to optimize their brand portfolio and better match consumer demand.

3. Risk mitigation direction: Platforms need to proactively track changes on the brand side, and prepare early risk responses for brands that are overly reliant on single blockbusters, lack growth momentum, or receive limited corporate resource support. At the same time, platforms should align with the consumer trend of prioritizing efficacy and cost-effectiveness, and guide入驻 brands to optimize their product structure and operation models to improve overall platform operational efficiency and consumer satisfaction.

Taking Origins' decline as a case study, this article illustrates new shifts in China's current beauty industry, providing a typical sample and new research directions for industrial research, as follows:

1. New industry trends: The plant-based skincare segment continues to grow steadily, and domestic Chinese brands have overtaken international brands in the clean beauty segment, completely rewriting the competitive landscape. Consumer decision-making has shifted from prioritizing brand origin to focusing on ingredients, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness; live-stream e-commerce has become the core growth channel for brands, and the traditional business model of relying on single blockbusters and offline counters is no longer viable.

2. New industry problems: International beauty groups have generally struggled with conservative strategy, slow product updates, and rigid operation styles in recent years. Amid their strategic shift to shrink non-core brands and focus on high-end luxury offerings, legacy mid-tier skincare brands are easily marginalized and trapped in growth stall.

3. Insights for future research: Researchers can further explore topics including the impact of international beauty groups' brand portfolio strategy adjustments on mid-tier brands, the product iteration and operation models of domestic Chinese plant-based brands, and growth logics for beauty brands in the new competitive environment, to summarize the new rules of competition in the beauty industry.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

继5月底全面撤出中国台湾百货专柜后,雅诗兰黛旗下天然植物护肤品牌Origins悦木之源再传关店消息。据悉,6月30日,品牌将关闭中国香港最后两处实体专柜,仅保留线上渠道运营。

这并非一次简单的渠道调整。曾以菌菇水风靡亚洲的悦木之源,曾是无数年轻消费者踏入中高端护肤大门的第一把钥匙。如今,却在一个月内接连撤出两个重要市场的线下阵地。

关店背后,是品牌长达数年的增长乏力与市场边缘化。在雅诗兰黛集团最新财报中,悦木之源成为护肤板块表现拖累销售额的品牌之一。

与此同时,全球植物护肤赛道仍在增长,国货品牌与国际对手却已悄然改写了竞争规则。一个先行者,为何成了掉队者?当线下渠道收缩、线上转型未明,悦木之源的中年危机还有解吗?

01 含着金汤匙出生,却困在“菌菇水”里

背靠雅诗兰黛集团出生,悦木之源含着金汤匙落地,起点已经赢过了大多数“同龄人”。

1990年,雅诗兰黛夫人的长孙威廉·兰黛在纽约创立Origins,中文名“悦木之源”,定位天然为本、科学为证的高效植物护肤。放在三十多年前,当市场还在被化学合成成分主导时,它打出了“天然萃取、零动物实验、极致环保”三张牌。这个理念颇为超前。

早期的悦木之源,舍得下慢功夫。

1990年,悦木之源推出的活性炭毛孔净透面膜(泥娃娃)是当时护肤界的创举;1997年的复合矿物维他命夜间修护霜一上市便风靡;2005年携手医学权威韦博士(Andrew Weil‌),首次将医学理念融入护肤。

回溯早期发展史,悦木之源的每款新品都有成分支撑与专业背书,在那个成分党概念尚未兴起的年代,它早已提前押注这一赛道。

渠道也没落下。在雅诗兰黛集团的强力托举下,悦木之源在创立后迅速开启国际化扩张。

在2010年,悦木之源进入中国香港,凭借灵芝焕能系列——包括被中国消费者昵称为“菌菇水”的明星单品,以及泥娃娃面膜,迅速积累了第一波粉丝。四年后入驻天猫。

公开资料显示,菌菇水所添加的灵芝精粹中的β葡聚糖、灵芝酸负责褪红抗氧,搭配白桦茸舒缓、甘草酸二钾修护、植物透明质酸保湿,多效合一,主打舒缓修复,被年轻消费者推上烂脸救星的神坛,成为无数人的护肤启蒙。

社交媒体尚未普及的年代,悦木之源就用两步锁定用户口碑:

一是锁定湿敷场景,用户分享“湿敷5-10分钟退红如一键消除”的即时体验,令产品效果一目了然;二是早期KOL推荐,@老爸评测等初代测评账号把菌菇水列为常用推荐对象,相关测评文章在博客、BBS上不断扩散。

那是悦木之源的高光时刻,不用铺天盖地的营销,仅靠几款爆品就撑起品牌认知度。时至今日,天猫旗舰店上菌菇水销量4万+,而排在第二的白胖子洁面慕斯只有1万+,其余产品不足1万。

雅诗兰黛2026财年第三季度财报(截至2026年3月31日)显示,悦木之源业绩下滑。悦木之源业绩下滑并非首次出现在雅诗兰黛财报中,2023财年第一季度、2024财年第二季度等,均有相关记录。

三十年过去,这个当年含着金汤匙出生的品牌,如今被自己的大单品牢牢困住。菌菇水还是那瓶菌菇水,但消费者和赛道,早已不是三十年前的样子了。

02 植物护肤赛道依然热闹,主角早已换了一批

悦木之源的落寞,并非植物护肤市场不景气,恰恰相反,这个赛道仍在扩张。2025年,全球天然绿色化妆品销售额达480亿美元,年复合增长率12%。

问题在于,格局变了。

天猫美妆《2023纯净美妆趋势报告》显示,截至2023年,国货品牌在纯净护肤领域的市场份额已达54%,首次实现对国际品牌的反超。

广度上,薇诺娜、百雀羚、孔凤春们广泛挖掘积雪草、金盏花、马齿苋、云南重楼等本土植物成分,形成差异化卖点;高度上,Fresh、Aesop等国际对手则以更强的品牌故事和溢价能力,牢牢卡位高端。

而在成分深度上,悦木之源同样不占优势。

以溪木源为例,同样主打真菌原料,却从成分溯源到功效验证层层递进。2021年发布第一代层孔菌产品,保持每年一更的节奏,至今已迭代至第五代。

今年5月发布的第五代层孔菌智控系列,宣称实现无酸智能分区控油2.0的技术跨越。价格上对比更直观,溪木源层孔菌精华水120ml到手价92.66元,单克重价格仅为悦木之源菌菇水(200ml/335元)的一半。

反观悦木之源,更新节奏慢得“令人着急”。菌菇水卖了二十年,仅升级过三次配方,目前在售的第四代还是2022年推出的,至今已过去四年。

消费者李然(化名)曾是菌菇水的忠实用户,如今已不再复购:“大学时觉得菌菇水很神奇,湿敷能退红。用了几年后,效果越来越不明显。后来换了其他牌子。”

这种贵而无感的认知,正在年轻人中蔓延。

社交平台上,有用户表示“以前很好用,消炎作用强,现在不好用了,长痘痘湿敷效果比以前差太多了”;也有用户直言:“当初买是因为宣称可改善闭口痘痘,但实际用起来没什么效果,只能当普通保湿水,那我还不如选性价比更高的。”

如今,植物护肤的消费者早已不再唯品牌出身论,而是更看重成分、功效、使用感和性价比。在成分党全面崛起的今天,悦木之源以不变应万变的策略,显得格格不入。

更严峻的是线上运营的滞后。

沿袭雅诗兰黛集团的运营基因,悦木之源过去依赖线下专柜和免税渠道。然而,疫情后线下客流下滑,品牌的线上转型却迟迟未能破局。

有米有数数据显示,悦木之源天猫旗舰店粉丝仅40.2万,不足溪木源(291万)的五分之一。近七天虽每日直播,场均观看仅0.8万人次,而溪木源为3.5万人次。

这种差距在销售转化上体现得更直接。近七天,悦木之源菌菇水直播销售额约为5000-7550元,而溪木源仅层孔菌喷雾单品就达到2.5-5万元,已是前者的五倍;若加上包含层孔菌喷雾的护肤套装,溪木源的直播销售额则达到12-30万元。

当品牌在线上内容场失声,消费者注意力早已被国货品牌抢走。悦木之源在直播电商这一关键渠道上,从人气到成交均被远远甩在身后。

据南方都市报报道,2022年雅诗兰黛发起了包括悦木之源在内的产品涨价。一边是产品端原地踏步,一边是逆势涨价,品牌的失速感越发严重。

一个先行者,既守不住线下,又攻不动线上,它在赛道的存在感还剩多少?

03 退守线上之后,是新起点还是边缘化?

悦木之源的落寞,与雅诗兰黛集团自身的困境脱不开干系。

过去几年,雅诗兰黛集团产品更新频率低、运营风格固化,与国际竞争对手相比显得保守。这种保守直接反映在业绩上:雅诗兰黛销售额从2022财年的177亿美元跌至2024财年的143亿美元,归母净利润从盈利24亿美元转为亏损11亿美元。

2025年1月,司泰峰接替傅懿德,成为雅诗兰黛集团第六任总裁兼CEO。

新官上任,司泰峰提出“Beauty Reimagined(重塑美妆新境)”战略,同时宣布在2026年底前大规模裁员,裁员上限已上调至10000人,占全球员工总数的17.5%。其中,超过70%的减员集中在百货公司及独立门店的美容顾问。

在这个节骨眼上,悦木之源撤出港澳线下专柜,并不意外,它只是集团瘦身计划中一个顺理成章的结果。

更值得关注的是集团对旗下品牌的“断舍离”。

据多家媒体报道,雅诗兰黛正寻求将Too Faced、Smashbox及Dr.Jart+打包出售,估值仅在数亿美元区间。而当年收购这三个品牌的花费超过25亿美元,如今可能以大幅折让价格割爱。

与此同时,集团宣布收购印度阿育吠陀美容品牌Forest Essentials剩余51%股份。双方合作始于2008年,雅诗兰黛先是以少数股权投资试水,2020年将持股比例提升至49%,如今决定全盘纳入。

一买一卖之间,信号清晰:减掉那些市场竞争优势偏弱的队伍,用有限的资源保护核心品牌。

问题随之而来,当集团收购同样是植物护肤定位的Forest Essentials,悦木之源还能拿到多少预算和耐心?

从资源配置来看,雅诗兰黛集团的优势和重心明显锚定在高端与奢华品牌上。

2026年4月,雅诗兰黛集团CEO司泰峰在接受36氪专访时表示:“我们的品牌组合主要在高端和奢华区间,这仍然是我们的优势所在。”这意味着集团的研发、营销、渠道资源可能会自然地向海蓝之谜、雅诗兰黛主品牌等高毛利资产倾斜。

而悦木之源这样一个产品迭代缓慢、销售额下滑的中端品牌,在集团以高端为锚的资源配置逻辑下,优先级注定不高。

转向线上究竟是战略转型的新起点,还是被悄然边缘化的前奏?答案取决于集团是否愿意为其投入资源重新打造产品线和用户运营体系。

但就目前来看,产品结构过度依赖经典单品,社交媒体声量远低于同期品牌,且其在集团内部的战略优先级持续走低,悦木之源的未来,恐怕不只是关店那么简单。

悦木之源的式微,折射出美妆市场竞争格局的深刻变化:靠一两个明星单品、靠线下专柜就能吃遍天下的日子,一去不复返了。植物护肤赛道依然热闹,但主角早已换了一批。

悦木之源的中年危机,或许才刚刚开始。

注:文/李斌,文章来源:创业最前线(公众号ID:chuangyezuiqianxian),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

【版权提示】亿邦动力倡导尊重与保护知识产权。未经许可,任何人不得复制、转载、或以其他方式使用本网站的内容。如发现本站文章存在版权问题,烦请提供版权疑问、身份证明、版权证明、联系方式等发邮件至run@ebrun.com,我们将及时沟通与处理。

已点赞

+1

{{ praise_text }}

好文章,值得被更多人看到

广告

下一篇

征集报名《品牌数字化服务商资源手册》

《品牌数字化服务商资源手册》展示数字化服务商风采,亿邦全年零售大会通发,触达更多资源,马上加入!

马上入驻

当果粒橙遭遇“中年危机”:年轻人凭啥为低糖饮料买单?

当这款国民果粒饮料背后标准化的工业生产工艺、配方细节被逐一拆解并公之于众,这位曾经稳居带果粒果汁赛道头部的老牌产品,正遭遇新的市场困境。

未来零售

2026-06-22 06:33:13