• 亿邦公众号
    • APP下载

永辉超市前三季度关闭325家门店 营收下滑22.21%

作者:孙煜 文章来源:蓝鲸新闻

2025-11-03 10:01

作者:孙煜 文章来源:蓝鲸新闻

2025-11-03 10:01

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

永辉超市业绩报告显示严重亏损和门店大幅减少,改革成效仍需时间。

1.关键经营数据:前三季度营收424.34亿元同比下降22.21%,归母净亏损7.09亿元;第三季度营收124.86亿元下滑25.55%,亏损4.69亿元;门店数量两年内从1000家减至450家,关闭325家门店。

2.改革实操:2024年启动“胖改”调改策略,效果为调改店客流平均增长80%,60%以上稳定店盈利超越5年峰值,但整体未改善;闭店产生租赁赔偿等费用拖累增长,现有调改门店222家,未调改228家。

3.未来计划:CEO王守诚称学习胖东来处于初级阶段,目标2-3年走出困境,5-10年成国民品牌;下半年继续调改和闭店,预计全年盈利承压但Q4好转。

品牌转型和消费趋势变化揭示零售新挑战。

1.消费行为观察:消费者习惯改变导致客流客单下滑,对购物体验和商品品质要求更高,品牌需适应此趋势提升吸引力。

2.品牌营销策略:永辉优化商品结构和采购模式,推动裸价控后台,上架9个自有品牌如橙汁和洗衣液,启示产品研发可聚焦高性价比品类;模仿胖东来提升客流但整体成效待验证,渠道建设需门店调改聚焦潜力点。

3.品牌渠道建设:门店大幅减少至450家,显示渠道收缩风险,但调改策略强调长期品牌重塑;合作名创优品获资金支持,启示品牌间合作可应对竞争。

市场变化和应对措施提供可学习点和风险提示。

1.政策解读:永辉主动调改门店淘汰尾部门店,应对零售竞争激烈和消费者需求变化;预计Q4好转,全年盈利承压但下半年继续推进。

2.增长机会:消费需求导向高性价比商品,自有品牌开发成新增长点;合作名创优品带来62.7亿资金和战略支持,可学习点包括供应链精简(供应商淘汰率40.4%)。

3.风险提示:连续三年累计亏损超80亿元,门店减少带来赔偿费用风险;事件应对上,CEO强调坚持长期主义,2-3年规划可借鉴于其他企业转型;最新商业模式模仿胖东来,调改店盈利提升但需防短期波动机会。

供应链优化和产品需求提供商业启示。

1.产品生产需求:永辉精简供应商体系淘汰率40.4%,强调高效合作需求;开发自有品牌商品如橙汁和纸面巾,揭示日用品设计和质量重要性。

2.商业机会:自有品牌上架创收机会,工厂可参与高周转品类合作;调改策略启示推进数字化需优化采购和库存管理以减成本。

3.电商启示:门店调改提升盈利,显示线下零售数字化融合趋势;CEO长期目标启示工厂需关注零售渠道变化应对市场需求。

行业痛点和解决方案展示服务需求点。

1.行业趋势:零售竞争激烈导致客流下滑,消费习惯变化促用户体验提升需求。

2.客户痛点:永辉毛利率下滑主因商品结构优化短期影响;门店关闭带来高额成本问题,服务商可针对此提供降本增效方案。

3.解决方案:调改策略通过优化供应链精简40.4%供应商提升效率;引入佘咸平等专家,启示服务商可输出专业团队经验;长期转型计划强调数字化整合解决持续亏损痛点。

平台管理需求和风险规避启示运营新举措。

1.平台需求:门店调改显示对新运营模式需求,如胖东来模式提升客流;招商机会在于与名创优品合作获资金支持。

2.最新做法:永辉启用90后CEO王守诚和佘咸平优化运营;调改店管理推动裸价控后台,专注潜力店淘汰尾部门店,启示平台风险规避策略。

3.运营管理:门店数量剧减至450家,管理需精简高效;预期Q4好转可借鉴于平台规划;供应链升级如自有品牌开发展示招商合作机会点。

产业新动向和商业模式揭示问题与启示。

1.产业新动向:永辉学习胖东来模式成为零售转型案例,名创优品入主带来战略变革;但调改店局部成功未转化整体改善,新问题是为什么改革未解决长期亏损?

2.新问题解析:连续三年亏损超80亿元主因竞争激烈和短期调改影响;门店减半暴露行业收缩挑战,研究需探讨政策支持如长期主义可行性。

3.商业模式启示:自有品牌开发和调改策略展示聚焦核心产品;CEO强调2-10年规划提供政策法规建议,启示产业应强化供给侧调整规避风险。

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

Yonghui Supermarket's performance report reveals significant losses and a sharp reduction in stores, with reform results requiring more time to materialize.

1. Key operational data: Revenue for the first three quarters was RMB 42.434 billion, down 22.21% year-on-year, with a net loss attributable to shareholders of RMB 709 million; Q3 revenue fell 25.55% to RMB 12.486 billion, with a loss of RMB 469 million; store count dropped from 1,000 to 450 over two years, with 325 closures.

2. Reform measures: The "Fat Reform" strategy launched in 2024 has boosted foot traffic by an average of 80% in adjusted stores, with over 60% of stabilized stores exceeding their five-year profit peaks, but overall performance remains weak; closure costs, including lease compensations, hinder growth, with 222 stores adjusted and 228 yet to be reformed.

3. Future plans: CEO Wang Shoucheng stated that learning from Pang Donglai is in its early stages, aiming to overcome difficulties in 2–3 years and become a national brand in 5–10 years; store adjustments and closures will continue in H2, with full-year profitability under pressure but Q4 expected to improve.

Brand transformation and shifting consumption trends highlight new retail challenges.

1. Consumer behavior insights: Changing habits have led to declines in foot traffic and average spend, with heightened demands for shopping experience and product quality, requiring brands to adapt to enhance appeal.

2. Brand marketing strategies: Yonghui optimized product mix and procurement, promoted transparent pricing, and launched nine private-label items like orange juice and laundry detergent, suggesting a focus on high-value categories; emulating Pang Donglai boosted traffic but overall impact remains unproven, underscoring the need for targeted store reforms in channel development.

3. Brand channel building: Store count plummeted to 450, indicating channel contraction risks, but reform strategies emphasize long-term brand rebuilding; partnership with Miniso provided financial support, illustrating how brand collaborations can mitigate competition.

Market shifts and countermeasures offer learnings and risk warnings.

1. Policy interpretation: Yonghui proactively adjusted stores and phased out underperformers to address intense retail competition and evolving consumer demands; Q4 improvement is expected, though full-year profitability remains pressured as reforms continue in H2.

2. Growth opportunities: Consumer preference for value-driven goods makes private-label development a new growth avenue; the Miniso partnership brought RMB 6.27 billion in funding and strategic support, with takeaways including supply chain streamlining (40.4% supplier淘汰率).

3. Risk alerts: Cumulative losses over three years exceed RMB 8 billion, with store closures incurring compensation costs; the CEO’s emphasis on long-term planning over 2–3 years offers a model for corporate transformation; while reformed stores show profit gains, short-term volatility requires caution.

Supply chain optimization and product demand offer business insights.

1. Production needs: Yonghui streamlined its supplier base with a 40.4%淘汰率, highlighting demand for efficient partnerships; private-label launches like orange juice and paper towels underscore the importance of design and quality in daily essentials.

2. Business opportunities: Private-label sales present revenue potential, with factories able to collaborate on high-turnover categories; reform strategies suggest digitizing procurement and inventory management to cut costs.

3. E-commerce启示: Store reforms boosting profits reflect the trend of offline retail integration with digital tools; the CEO’s long-term goals indicate factories must monitor retail channel shifts to meet market demands.

Industry pain points and solutions reveal service demand areas.

1. Industry trends: Fierce retail competition has reduced foot traffic, while changing消费习惯 drive need for enhanced user experiences.

2. Client pain points: Yonghui’s毛利率 decline stems from short-term product mix optimization; store closures incur high costs, creating opportunities for cost-reduction solutions.

3. Solutions: Reform strategies improved efficiency by trimming 40.4% of suppliers; hiring experts like She Xianping shows service providers can offer specialized team expertise; long-term digital integration addresses persistent loss issues.

Platform management needs and risk avoidance inspire operational innovations.

1. Platform demands: Store reforms highlight need for new models, like Pang Donglai’s approach to boost traffic; partnership opportunities exist, as with Miniso’s funding support.

2. Latest practices: Yonghui appointed post-90s CEO Wang Shoucheng and She Xianping to optimize operations; reformed store management emphasizes transparent pricing and focusing on high-potential locations, offering risk-mitigation lessons.

3. Operational management: Store count plummeted to 450, requiring leaner management; Q4 improvement forecasts can inform platform planning; supply chain upgrades like private-label development present partnership avenues.

Industry shifts and business models reveal issues and insights.

1. New developments: Yonghui’s adoption of Pang Donglai’s model exemplifies retail transformation, while Miniso’s involvement signals strategic change; yet localized success in reformed stores hasn’t reversed overall decline, raising questions about why reforms fail to resolve long-term losses.

2. Issue analysis: Three-year losses exceeding RMB 8 billion stem from intense competition and short-term reform impacts; halved store count exposes industry contraction, warranting research into policy support like long-termism feasibility.

3. Model启示: Private-label development and reform strategies demonstrate focus on core products; the CEO’s 2–10 year plan offers policy implications, suggesting industries should strengthen supply-side adjustments to mitigate risks.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

10月30日晚,永辉超市发布2025年第三季度业绩报告,第三季度营收124.86亿元,同比下滑25.55%;归母净利润-4.69亿元,较上年同期下降1.16亿元。

另据公告,永辉超市前三季度实现营业收入424.34亿元,同比下降22.21%,归母净利润-7.09亿元,较上年同期下降6.32亿元。

永辉超市自2024年5月启动“胖改”,官方给出的调改效果是“永辉调改店客流平均增长80%,60%以上进入稳定期的调改门店盈利水平超越过去5年最高值。”但为何公司整体营收、利润并未见长?

对于营收的下滑,永辉超市在三季报中给出的原因是,一方面,零售行业竞争激烈,部分消费者消费习惯的改变以及消费者对购物体验、商品品质等要求更高,公司客流、客单均出现一定程度下滑。另一方面,公司主动进行门店优化调改,在对潜力门店进行关店改造的同时淘汰关闭了部分尾部门店,以上两方面因素共同影响使得公司同店销售及门店数量均有所下滑。

此外,永辉表示,利润的下滑主要受营收和毛利率下滑的影响,三季度毛利率下滑主要是公司在门店调改过程中主动优化商品结构和采购模式,在淘汰旧品,引入新品的过程中主动推动裸价和控后台的策略,属于转型过程中的短期影响。

从开、闭店情况看,永辉超市在今年三季度净关店数102家、新开2家门店。时间拉长,永辉超市此前公告显示,2023年底门店数为1000家、2024年底为775家、2025年三季度末为450家,不到两年时间,门店数量减半。

大量闭店产生的租赁及人员赔偿、商品出清费用,一定程度拖累永辉超市整体业绩增长。

从三季报披露的最新调改情况看,截至9月30日,现存调改已开业门店222家,以当前450家门店计算,仍有228家门店未进行调改。

永辉CEO王守诚近日公开表态,永辉现在还不成熟,学习胖东来模式仍处于初级阶段,但永辉需要坚持长期主义,希望用2到3年走出生死线,5到10年真正成为一个国民超市品牌。

永辉超市2001年创立于福建,凭借生鲜差异化战略成为行业翘楚,2010年12月登陆上交所,2019年门店数达到巅峰的1440家,然而自2021年录得首次亏损后,连续三年业绩未能扭转,三年累计亏损超80亿元。

2024年5月,永辉超市启动学习胖东来调改,同年9月,因看重“胖改”效果,名创优品斥资62.7亿元收购永辉超市29.4%股份,成为第一大股东,名创优品创始人叶国富也加入永辉调改中,今年3月,永辉超市成立改革领导小组,叶国富担任组长。

名创优品入主后,叶国富从人员、供应链两方面进行改革。今年以来,启用从永辉超市内部成长起来的90后CEO王守诚,聘任曾在山姆中国、盒马鲜生担任生鲜采购总监的佘咸平担任首席产品官。

供应链方面,永辉超市三季报显示,报告期内,商品中心持续推进供应链升级工作,通过精简供应商体系,实现供应商淘汰率达40.4%,截至目前,已上架9支自有品牌商品,包含橙汁、洗衣液、纸面巾等。

在此前召开的半年度业绩会上,永辉管理层提到,下半年将继续推进门店调改和闭店工作,预计全年盈利承压,但进入第四季度后会有明显好转。

注:文/孙煜,文章来源:蓝鲸新闻,本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

【版权提示】亿邦动力倡导尊重与保护知识产权。未经许可,任何人不得复制、转载、或以其他方式使用本网站的内容。如发现本站文章存在版权问题,烦请提供版权疑问、身份证明、版权证明、联系方式等发邮件至run@ebrun.com,我们将及时沟通与处理。

已点赞

+1

{{ praise_text }}

好文章,值得被更多人看到

FAQ回顾

永辉超市2025年前三季度营收和利润情况如何?

永辉超市2025年前三季度实现营业收入424.34亿元,同比下降22.21%;归母净利润亏损7.09亿元,较上年同期下降6.32亿元。第三季度单季营收124.86亿元,同比下滑25.55%。

永辉超市门店调改的具体效果和计划是什么?

永辉超市自2024年5月启动胖东来模式调改,调改店客流平均增长80%,60%以上稳定期门店盈利超过去5年最高值。截至2025年9月30日,已完成222家门店调改,计划用2-3年走出生死线。

名创优品收购永辉超市后进行了哪些改革?

名创优品2024年9月斥资62.7亿元收购永辉29.4%股份后,启用90后CEO王守诚,任命佘咸平为首席产品官,供应链方面淘汰40.4%供应商,已推出9支自有品牌商品。

广告

下一篇

征集报名《品牌数字化服务商资源手册》

《品牌数字化服务商资源手册》展示数字化服务商风采,亿邦全年零售大会通发,触达更多资源,马上加入!

马上入驻

京东11.11的“经营底色”转向: 从降本到AI赋能 从保障到价值共生

电商竞争正在发生结构性转变。过去以流量为核心的增长逻辑,正让位于以经营效率和可持续增长为导向的新阶段。

未来零售 京东 电商平台 AI

2025-11-03 10:00:59